Laserfiche WebLink
February 2000 Chapter 3 Page 3-57 <br />Saturated alluvium along the North Fork of the Gunnison River and primary tributary drainages <br />(Terror and Hubbard creeks) has been developed for industrial, domestic, and livestock use. <br />Area well yields range from 5 to 120 gpm and average 17 gpm (Bowie, 1998 and Oxbow, <br />1999). Several domestic wells are located at the mouths of Terror and Hubbard creeks. <br />Oxbow utilizes an infiltration gallery for its main fresh water source. I he gallery is esiabiisiied <br />in the alluvium of the North Fork of the Gunnison River south of Sanborn Creek. The reported <br />maximum withdrawal rate is about 50 gpm (Oxbow, 1999). <br />The alluvial groundwater resources in the North Fork of the Gunnison River, as well as in Terror <br />and Hubbard creeks, are elevationally lower than the proposed mined coal seams and are <br />outside the predicted zone of potential mine-induced impacts. Saturated alluvium is unconfined <br />and is recharged primarily by seepage from rivers and streams and, to a minor extent, by <br />discharge from water-bearing bedrock and direct precipitation. Groundwater flow gradient in <br />the alluvium follows the local drainage topography. <br />Water-bearing coAuvial deposits are found abng the slopes of area drainages and on.the gentle <br />terrain of the ridge tops, as noted by the occurrence of numerous seasonal springs and seeps. <br />These saturated deposits are perched, limited in lateral extent, and are not considered <br />significant water resources. However, several local stockponds are constructed to collect the <br />seasonal spring flow. Local springs and seeps issue from these zones during periods of high <br />precipitation and snowmelt. Seasonal spring and seep flows range from less than 1 gpm to <br />about 5 gpm and are reported to be dry from summer to spring except after major precipitation <br />events. Direct precipitation and snowmelt recharge these deposits. Groundwater is <br />unconfined, and the flow direction follows the local topography. <br />The Wasatch Formation is cemposed of interbedded sandstone, siltstone, shale, and claystone. <br />Sandstone beds are generally thin and limited in lateral extent. The Wasatch Formation <br />outcrops on the gentle ridge tops of the Elk Creek Coal Lease Tract and Iron Point.Exploration <br />License area. Groundwater occurrence has been identified from numerous seeps and springs. <br />These springs are generally perennial and are associated with thih sandstone outcrops <br />overlying shale or claystone beds. Flow rates typicaNy decrease during the summer and fail <br />seasons (personal communication with Dan Hudson of Hotchkiss Ranches). <br />Springs and seeps also issue from landslide deposits in the Wasatch Formation where <br />slumping has juxtaposed permeable strata with low permeable material. Slumping features <br />also form catchments that hold snowmelt runoff enhancing recharge potential. Springs that <br />issue from landslide deposits are ephemeral, flowing only during the wet season and during <br />periods of high precipitation (personal communication with Dan Hudson of Hotchkiss Ranches). <br />The saturated zones in the Wasatch Formation are considered perched and with limited storage <br />potential. Due to the outcrop logtion and gentle terrain of Wasatch Formation, recharge is <br />primarily from snowmelt and direct precpitation infiltration. Numerous (about 40) local <br />stockponds are fed from springs issuing from the Wasatch Formation. See Figure 19, <br />Groundwater Hydrology. <br />Based on mining and drilling data and spring and seep surveys, groundwater in the Mesa Verde <br />Formation is limited to isolated sandstone beds in the barren and coal bearing members, the <br />Rollins Sandstone member, various coal beds, and along fault and fracture zones. Low primary <br />permeability and limited storage gpacity of the Mesa Verde Formation hydrogeologic units limit <br />potential groundwater resource development (Brooks, 1983). However, significant quantities of <br />groundwater are reported where the Mesa Verde Formation is fractured (Brooks, 1983). <br />