My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE43804
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE43804
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:46:17 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:42:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
m2004044
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/22/2004
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Tetra Tech RMC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TETRA TECH RMC Mr. Larry Oehler <br />Adequacy Response M-2004-044 <br />November 22, 2004 <br />Page 11 of 20 <br />moves toward the river through the alluvium. It appears that the slurry wall <br />may cut offground water flow to the natural area. Demonstrate that the slurry <br />wall will not block the groundwater flow into the natural area to the extent that <br />it will cause the trees and other vegetation reliant on the normal groundwater <br />surface to die from lack of water. What is the expected shadowing effect on the <br />ground water table? Will the shadowing effect be enough to cause cottonwood <br />trees and other vegetation to die in the natural area? What will Aggregate <br />Industries do to correct it if this problem begins to occur? <br />Tetra Tech RMC performed a groundwater model analysis for the Tucson South <br />site, Tucson South Resource Groundwater Modeling Study on the Hydraulic <br />Effects of Mining (August 2004). The modeling report was submitted to the <br />Division on August 3, 2004. <br />Groundwater flows from south-southwest to north-northeast, and hence no <br />"shadowing effect" in the Morgan Smith Natural Area. The proximity of the <br />River also minimizes the impacts of groundwater levels in the Morgan Smith <br />Natural Area. <br />Scenario 4 (Figures 5 and 6), was modeled as dewatering the Tucson South Phase <br />2A area, dewatering the Challenger mine, and the slurry wall around the Tucson <br />South Phase 2 east cell is not yet constmcted. The groundwater model predicts a <br />2-3 foot draw-down in the Morgan Smith Natural Area. However, the impact <br />from the Phase 2A area has historically been occumng for the period mining and <br />dewatering has been happening in this area, with no known measured impact. If <br />the trees in this area are impacted, Aggregate can direct dewatering water to the <br />ground surface in this area for imgation. This draw-down would be temporary <br />until the slurry wall in installed around the Phase 2 east cell area. <br />As indicated in Scenario 5 and shown graphically in Figure 7 and 8 of the <br />modeling report, the simulated cumulative effect of the groundwater for the area <br />after the slurry wall is installed around the Phase 2 east cell, has no impact on <br />groundwater levels in the Morgan Smith Natural Area. <br />10. The Division of Wildlife recommends that the proposed operation avoid <br />destroying the black-tailed prairie dog town on the west edge of the west area. <br />The DOW did not provide a map showing where the town is located. From <br />their description, it appears that the town may be in the West Fil[ Area where it <br />may be buried when overburden, clay lens material and topsoil is placed there. <br />The DOW lists the prairie dogs as a "species of special concern "and <br />recommends that the prairie dogs be relocated or humanely killed prior to any <br />earth moving. Please discuss how Aggregate Industries will contend with the <br />prairie dogs. Refer to Rule 3 Section 1.8(1). <br />H:U919_Ol9_OIVvfLRH\DMG Response\I st Adequacy Response to DMG I I-5-04.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.