PERMFILE43364 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6. Objectors' Allegation That Allen's Application Is Incomplete Because Allen Failed To Provide Proper Notice To "Mr. Cargill" As An "Owner Of Record" Of Mineral Rights In The Subject Property Is Unfounded. a. N.C. Cargill is not an owner of record to whom Allen should have given notice. Objectors have argued that the reservation of certain mineral rights in favor of N.C. Cazgill and Lora E. Cazgill contained in a 1963 Warranty Deed recorded in Pazk County, Colorado, establishes "Mr. Cazgill" as an Owner of Record to whom Allen should have given notice of its application pursuant to Rule 1.6.2(1)(e)(i). See 1963 Warranty Deed (Exhibit 2). While it is uncertain whether Objectors' reference to "Mr. Cazgill" pertains to N.C. Cazgill or his son, Robert Cazgill, it is cleaz that Allen was not required to give notice, pursuant to Rule 1.6.2(1)(e)(i), to any member of the Cargill family. Neither N.C. Cazgill nor Lora E. Cazgill were living at the time Allen submitted its application-N.C. Cazgill died in 1978, and Lora E. Cazgill passed away in 1993. See Colorado Springs Gazette Obituary and Memorial Gazdens Cemetery records (Exhibit 58). Thus, Allen could not have provided notice to either N.C. or Lora Cazgill. b. Robert Cargill is not an owner of record to whom Allen should have given notice. N.C. Cazgill's son, Robert Cazgill, is not an Owner of Record of the subject property. Rule 1.1(34) defines "Owner of Record" as "the owner or owners of a surface property interest shown on the records of the County Assessor as of the date of filing" (emphasis addedj. The records of the County Assessor do not show Robert Cazgill as an owner of any interest-either surface or subsurface-in the subject property. See Park County Assessor's Property Detail and Assessment Information for the Subject Property (Exhibit 75). Furthermore, and as the Objectors themselves have shown, no[ even the records of the Park County Clerk and Recorder