Laserfiche WebLink
Where partially extracted room-and-pillar workings exist, maximum observed subsidence averaged up to 10 feet. <br />• Surface cracking has been associated with this subsidence. In general, the cracks tended to parallel the surface <br />topography. Surface cracking was best developed where sandstone beds lie at or neaz the ground surface or the <br />overburden is less than 400 feet thick. <br />Predicted Subsidence Phenomena <br />The development and magnitude of surface subsidence are dependent on 1) overburden depth, 2) geology, 3) surface <br />topography, and 4) mine layout. <br />Overburden Deoth. The magnitude of vertical subsidence is very dependent upon both the depth of overburden above <br />the extracted area, denoted as height (h), and the dimensions of the extracted area, denoted as width (w) and length (I). <br />The length of the extracted area is critical when the length is less than ].4 times the width. The extracted area's width <br />and the overburden depths are used to calculate the width: depth ratio (denoted as w:h). Depending on the value of <br />the w: h ratio, excavations can be classified as critical, super-critical, or sub-critical. Critical subsidence conditions <br />normally result in a U or V shaped subsidence trough. For these conditions, one (1) point, usually at the center of the <br />extracted azea, reaches critical or maximum subsidence, (SMAX). <br />Super-critical subsidence conditions exist when the w:h ratio is greater than the critical conditions. Super-critical <br />conditions normally result in a flat-bottom trough. An area on the ground surface reaching the maximum or critical <br />subsidence characterizes this trough. <br />Sub-critical subsidence conditions exist when the w:h ratio is less than that required for critical conditions. Sub- <br />critical conditions normally result in a V shaped subsidence trough. The maximum subsidence measured for these <br />• conditions is less than the critical subsidence. <br />Using National Coal Board of Great Britain (NCB) values (NCB, 1975), a summary of w:h ratios for typical mining <br />geometry's in the CEC permit azea have been calculated. These w:h ratios are tabulated on Table 82, Width:Depth <br />Ratios for I.ongwall Panel No. 1 (600 Foot Extraction Width), and Table 83, Width:Depth Ratios for Multiple, <br />Adjacent Longwall Panels. Based on the values found on these tables, the ratio of subsidence to extracted seam <br />height will generally be sub-critical to critical for individual longwall panels. However, multiple, adjacent longwall <br />panels will generally result in super- critical conditions for most mining geometry's except those where the <br />overburden is greater than 1400 feet. Basically, the tables indicate that the maximum subsidence that can develop <br />will develop when three (3) or more adjacent longwall panels are mined. <br />Overburden depth can affect the magnitudes of horizontal strains. As the overburden depth increases, subsidence <br />decreases and the effects of subsidence are distributed over a much larger area. Surface strains then tend to be <br />reduced as depth increases. Maximum compressive strains should occur near panel centerlines. Maximum tensile <br />strains should occur over ribsides separating mined out areas from solid coal. <br />Geoloev. Investigations in Australia (Kapp, 1974), New Mexico (Gentry, Stewart, and King, 1981), Colorado <br />(Dunrud, 1976), and Utah (Bom, 1982) indicate that the stratigraphy and geologic structure of the rock overburden are <br />factors which control the magnitude of subsidence. Stronger strata apparently occupy a greater volume as failure <br />occurs. This results in a reduction in magnitude of vertical subsidence movement. Test borings in the permit area <br />indicate that the overburden contains approximately 39% thick sandstone beds, 8% thin sandstone beds, 11% sandy <br />siltstones, 35% very fine-grained classics (siltstone, mudstone, and shale), and 7% coal. <br />• Subsidence measurements at the CEC Mirtes (Bogenreif, 1984 and Eikens, 1986] indicate that geology does have an <br />impact on the magnitude of maximum subsidence that occurs at the mine site. The large percentage of thick <br />sandstone units significantly reduces the magnitude of maximum subsidence resulting from mining. Based on similar <br />geologic environments, subsidence in the planned permit area should be similar to that experience at other locations <br />Permit Renewal No 3 2.05-58 7/15/98 <br />