Laserfiche WebLink
~_ <br />--..~ <br />TUTTLE APPLEGATE RINDAHL, INC. <br />.= Consultants for Land and Resource Development <br />Mr. John lloerfer• <br />Mired Land Reclamation Divisior~ <br />July 'c'c, 1988 <br />Pabe 5 <br />Re-establishing Ct~al Creek. in the nridd le .~P the post-mining <br />channel is intentional. Coat Creek. has a nat t_iral tendency <br />to meander and +~nce mining is c+~nrplet ed, it will cent inue to <br />do so. Your• observation abo,_~t it beino_ difficult to peedici: <br />the final location ;~f the stream is correct. General <br />observations also can be made that it will probably assume zi <br />c~~nfigur•ation with the same sinu~~sity. Coal Creek curr^ently <br />meanders and occasionally erodes steep cut banks otn sides Of" <br />the channel. This process will continue after mining is <br />c~~ntplet ed. There is no reasonable measure that anyon P_ ca,•~, <br />d~~ t,~ prevent this nat+_tr•al or•ocess, save out the Creek int,~ <br />a r•ectangular• concrete channel. <br />The bottom material will be c~~ntposed of sands, windblown <br />silts, clays, and silty sands. This mat er•ial will be> <br />cohesive. Str-eant sco,ar• has always ,~cc,ar•r•ed in this ar^ea <br />regardless +~f the material in place. Flood flows thr•~~ugf~t <br />the area ar•e as capable of nr~~ving sand bar•t ides as they are <br />of moving the r•e,7ect fines. The mining and r•eclanration piar•~ <br />will minimize er•osi~~n and sct~ur•!ng +~f dist,.~r•bed materials. <br />Fiowever•, it is impossible to c,~ntoletely eliminate sc,~ur•int:;f <br />even if mining in this area was not done at all. <br />A concern abo,_tt creating gr•eater• runoff d,ar•ino a storm <br />because of reduced per•nreability in the flo~~dDlain is valid. <br />Localized flows will 6e sl it]ht ly increased. Fi,~wever•, it••, <br />looking at the C~~al Creek basin can a regional level, the <br />effect of the mining operation will 6e to reduce flood peak:.: <br />dt~wnstr•eam in urbanl zed areas dur•inq rra~,~r• st t~rnts. The <br />mining plan sh,~ws eioht Iocat ions where the channel is:: <br />constricted by existing too•~graph is feat ur•es such as tree <br />pockets. Mining upstream of these areas is creating ei <br />larger v,~Iunre ~~f detent i~~n. The backwat er• created by the <br />channel constrictions during a nta~or• flood will pr•od,acr:;> <br />aoprox innately 66tR acre-feet ~~f additional storage. Enclosed <br />is a c+~py of a Setter to the Urban Drainage and Flooc:i <br />Cent r•ol Dist r•ict that discusses this b~~int. Their r•esot'+nse <br />to this concern is concur•r•ence that an increase in storage;> <br />appears r•easonab le. The locat i~~n L~f this pr•o~ect in the <br />headwaters of C,~al Creek actually makes this increase it•i <br />fioodplain storage beneficial t~~ the urban areas downstream. <br />