Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department or Natural Resources <br />I } 13 Sherman St.. Room 215 <br />Denier, Colorado 80.01 D l v l s l O N O r <br />Phone: 13031 8b6-7567 M[ N E RA L 5 <br />FAC: 1303) 83?-8106 & <br /> GEOLOGY <br /> RECLAMATION <br /> MINING•gAFE TY <br />DATE: December 26 <br />2000 gill Owens <br /> , Gavemor <br /> Greg E. Walther <br />TO: Tom Schreiner E"`°"ve D""`« <br /> Michael B. Long <br />D~•~swn O~.ecca <br />FROM: Allen Sorenson <br />RE: Stability Analysis, Hall-Irwin Corporation, <br /> North La Poudre Resource, File No. M-2000-144 <br />I have reviewed the stability analysis provided with the above referenced application. The closest <br />structure to the proposed near vertical pit walls is a Sinclair gas pipeline. The application specifies a <br />mining setback of 50 feet from the pipeline. The application further states that the pit depth will <br />generally not exceed 20 feet. Typically, any mining setback in an alluvial gravel pit that is equal to or <br />greater than two-times the maximum pit depth may be considered a safe, conservative, and prudent <br />protection measure. Also, the Applicant provided limit equilibrium stability analyses yielding a slope <br />stability safety factor of 1.5 for the gas pipeline. Although I do not necessarily agree that the sheaz <br />strength for the claystone bedrock input to the analyses is sufficiently conservative for a critical cross <br />section of the proposed slope, the Applicant's demonstration is additional evidence that the proposed 50 <br />foot setback for the pipeline is satisfactory. (It is the Division's experience that residual strength <br />weathered shale or claystone at the toe of a pit wall may be the weak layer that causes slumping or slope <br />failure; residual strength weathered shale may be modeled using c=0 and ~=14 degrees). <br />In summary, the Division can approve the mining setbacks proposed in the application. The Applicant <br />should commit to mazking the underground utilities and establishing the setback lines oa the ground <br />prior to mining. Of greater concern than the setback distances, is the potential for the lateral berm that <br />will support the Sinclair pipeline following mining to be washed out during a flood. The Applicant <br />must provide a design for the Division's review and approval that will demonstrate and ensure <br />equalization of hydrostatic pressure between the two mining pods during a flood. This design must be <br />approved prior to consideration of the reclamation peanit application for approval. <br />c:~windowstpersanal~noM la poudrc dot <br />