Laserfiche WebLink
.~ <br /> <br />R. J. Irish <br />Consulting Engineering <br />Geologist, Inc. <br />In the vicinity of Buena Vista the Sawatch Fault, a major element of the Rift, does not seem <br />to evidence reactivation younger than about 2 million years ago. On the western side of the <br />graben near Buena Vista, faults reportedly evidence reactivation from about 30,000 years ago <br />to 4,000 years ago, and a recurrence level of 10,000 to 40,000 years. <br />Conceivably, a Magnitude 6 to 7 earthquake could be generated along a fault within 5 miles <br />of the quarry site, and that could subject the site to a peak particle velocity (PPV) of about 0.3 to <br />0.4 g.; but we consider the risk of that occurrence to be low during the next few hundred years. <br />We suggest that a PPV of 0.1 g. would be a more realistic value. Importantly, the rock at the <br />quarry site should dampen the seismic waves considerably. <br />Assessment of Rock Quarry Cut-Slope Stability <br />The back wall cut-slope of the planned quarry will face essentially due westward, whereas <br />the side slopes, at right angles to the back slope, will face north and south. As currently <br />planned, the cut-slopes are to be benched to promote cut-slope stability. Consequently, the <br />joints of the 3 main joints sets that strike 5° to 15° either west or east of north are likely to <br />appreciably influence, if not entirely govern, breakage along the back wall. Similarly, the near- <br />horizontally dipping joints of 3 other joint sets should influence breakage across the side walls, <br />with the joints of 1 set dipping out of each one of the 3 planned cut-slopes. They are likely to <br />promote the placement of the risers because the rock will tend to break-out, after drilling and <br />blasting, to those surfaces. Those joints typically are widely spaced, however, thus their <br />influence should be relatively minor. Moreover, the surfaces of those planes are expected to be <br />rough, thus the friction factors for those planes are expected to be high. Resistance to the <br />sliding of blocks and slabs out of the cut-slopes along those planes should be high. <br />Given the high degree of rock massivity, the relatively favorable geometric configuration of <br />the 7 principal systems of steeply dipping joints relative to the planned back wall and side wall <br />cut-slopes, and the superior intergranular strength characteristics of the granodiorite at this site, <br />~we conclude that these cut slopes should be benched with 10-foot wide steps (that wide mainly <br />for operational necessity) spaced apart about 2D feet in elevation; and with the risers drill-and- <br />blast-excavated to 1/4:1'S( 6°)2 slopes~h~t riser cut-slope angle would result in an equivalent <br />cut-slope angle of abou~ 34:1 (about 56°)~hat proposed cut-slope angle is shallower than the <br />angle of 1/2:1 (63°) for the theoretical joint commonly assumed to govern cut-slope stability <br />during an empirical evaluation of potential cut-slope stability in granitic rock. Moreover, that <br />3/4:1 angle should allow the cut-slopes to respond satisfactorily to the most probable PPV for <br />this site. as well. <br />Some of the risers will break to high angle (80°+) to near-vertical joints that will dip out of <br />those cut-slopes sections along strikes that closely sub-parallel the trends of the cut-slopes, at <br />least for several tens of feet laterally along the slope. That, however, should not detract from <br />cut-slope stability in general or riser cut-slope stability in particular because the resulting natural <br />planed surfaces should be at least as stable as the 3/4:1 slopes cut through the rock. That <br />' Vertical o horizontal. <br />sured from the horizontal. <br />' Risers cut steeper than about 1/4:1 tend to have unstable overhangs that need to be re-shot. <br />