PERMFILE42704 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.. .. . .:.lri • DEPARTMENT OFTME ARMY NEA DOW RTERf, RORT Ca R3DN AND MEA D9 UARTE RD, STN IMM NTRY DIVI{IOM (ME 014N1S [D) FORT Gt RfON, CD LORADO ~M1~.SDDO REFIT To December 10, 1990 AT TEN TIOH O~ Environment, Energy and Natural Resources Mined Land Reclamation Division Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman St „ Room 215 Denver, Colorado 80203 Dear Mr. Humphries: provided the opportunity to comment on the entire package. The following are the comments and concerns which should be considered or included into your permitting process: ^ 1 I III III II~II~I III I am writing in response to the proposed Mining and Reclamation Permit, File No. M-90-143. At the present time, Fort Carson has not been provided with the entire reclamation plan for review. Respectfully request that prior to approval, we are 8. A fugitive dust permit will be required. b. Under items 11., Primary Future Land Use and 12., Primary Present Land Use, rangeland is the only item checked as appropriate. Actually, rangeland ie not considered as the primary use for either category. I realize that military training activities is not listed, but this is the principle use. If a category can not be added, then wildlife habitat and recreation should be the primary use of both items 11. and 12. c. Conditions placed upon DFC Ceramics for reclamation of the disturbed sites Should rexiect recommendations of the U.S. Soil Conservation and the Natural Resources Office at Fort Carson. d. If, in the sole opinion of a designated Fort Carson representative, any of the drivers under DFC Ceramics direction, act unsafely or discourteously, ie, speeding, unlawful or unsafe driving practices, acting in a manner as to create a nuisance, etc., then all operations will temporarily cease, until the problem can be satisfactorily resolved. e. sort Carson will not be held liable for any accidents resulting from any portion of the mining or hauling operations.