My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE42472
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE42472
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:44:56 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:11:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
X198816822
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/8/1988
Doc Name
NOI Amendment Application
From
PEABODY COAL
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• SURVEY PROCEDURES <br />Literature Search and Records Check <br />An intensive search of the Office of the State Archaeologist of Colorado (OSAC), and the <br />Office of the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) was carried out on August 21 <br />and 22, 1979. A search of the records of the Little Snake Resource Area of The BLM was <br />carried out by the Little Snake Resource Area Archaeologist, Sherri Hanson, and re- <br />ported to WCRM, Inc. on August 27, 1979. Both OSAC and the BLM produced identical <br />information, while the SHPO search was negative. <br />Seven sites were recorded almost five miles to the northwest of the study area by the <br />Laboratory of Public Archaeology (LOPA) including five aboriginal sites and two historic <br />sites. These were reported in Arthur (1977) and this material is discussed in more detail <br />in the "Previous Research" section. <br />5RT118 was recorded by Kranzush and Gordon just to the north of the study area. This is <br />• a rock art/rock shelter site. The rock art is provisionally assigned to the Ute Tribe. No <br />other sites have been previously recorded within reasonable proximity to the study area. <br />Field Methods <br />The project area received a 100% pedestrian survey. Spacing of the field crew depended <br />upon topography and intuitive assessment of site probability. Ridgetops were surveyed <br />by Two to four archaeologists walking five To 20 meters apart in a parallel zigzag fash- <br />ion. In heavy thickets of scrub oak, which occurred frequently on ridgetops, the spacing <br />and zigzag pattern depended in Jorge degree upon game trails, as the thickets are virtu- <br />ally impenetroble in the absence of such troils. Some transecis were partially completed <br />on hands and knees. <br />Alluvial bottoms, fans, benches, and sage flats were surveyed in a similar manner, gen- <br />erally without the interference of dense shrub oak thickets. Steep slopes were tran- <br />sected with spacing up to 35 meters apart, since site probability is very low, and <br />vegetation is very thick. Rock exposures on steep slopes were given very close attention, <br />however, due to the high probability of rock art and rock shelter sites. Arroyos in rela- <br />• lively flat areas and in some very steep situations, were walked by at least one archaeo- <br />logist and often by two orchaeologists. Aspen groves were given a close examination, <br />due to the probability of historic carvings. <br />5-II <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.