My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE42414
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE42414
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:44:53 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:09:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/2/2006
Doc Name
District Court Civil Case
From
City of Black Hawk
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />revegetation as required by the Construction Materials Rules. Aspects of the <br />reclamation plan not adequately covered by the bond amount include, but are not <br />limited to, the actual current cost to provide a reasonable density of trees and <br />shrubs; the quantity of topsoil shown in Applicant's own reclamation plan; <br />sufficient water for reestablishment of vegetation after mining; sufficient soil <br />amendments and preparation to accomplish Applicant's own reclamation plan; <br />and monitoring for a minimum period of time necessary to determine whether <br />revegetation has been established. <br />G. Contrary to law, without support of substantial evidence in the record, and <br />with significant credible evidence to the contrary, the MLRB erroneously <br />concluded that the MMRR Quarry Application's potential impact on waters of the <br />United States would not require notice to the Army Corp of Engineers or a Cleaz <br />Water Act Permit based on the conclusion that there were no indicators of <br />wetlands on the property and, therefore, no waters of the United States on the <br />property. See Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law and Order, pazagraph 37. On <br />the contrary, by definition, waters of the United States include waters other than <br />jurisdictional wetlands. It was in excess of the MLRB's authority to approve the <br />application without fully exploring the MMRR Quarry Application's potential <br />impact on waters of the United States, as correctly defined, and the Application <br />may be incomplete if any permits, licenses, or approvals are required by C.M.R. <br />6.4.13 in light of the Application's potential impact on waters of the United <br />States. <br />WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs request this Court order designation and certification of all <br />portions of the record; and that this Court thereafter hold unlawful and set aside the MLRB's <br />approval of the MMRR Quarry Application, restrain the implementation of the approved <br />application, and remand this case for further proceedings. <br />DATED this 1st day of March, 2006. <br />HAYES, PHILLIPS, HOFFMANN <br />& CARBERRY, P.C. <br />By: /s/ Hilary Mogue Graham <br />Corey Y. Hoffmann <br />Hilary Mogue Graham <br />ATTORNEYS FOR CITY OF BLACK <br />HAWK, COLORADO <br />E-FILED PER RULE 121. ORIGINAL SIGNED COPY <br />ON FILE AT THE OFFICES OF HAYES, PHILLIPS, <br />HOFFMANN& CARBERRY, P.C. <br />6 <br />i///O6 <br />Q:1 USERSIBFAHMGIM/NlNG APPLICATION-MMRR QUARRYIAPPEALICOMPLAINT-FMAL2.DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.