My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE42319
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE42319
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:44:49 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:05:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 13 Fill Stability Report 1
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />• 4. Contour mining and,=.backfill is planned in lower Lorencito Canyon. Small <br />excess spoil fills a5edimentation ponds are associated with the <br />contour mining. ` <br />Area Mining <br />The extent of surtace area mining is shown on Fig. 1. Post mining contours are <br />planned to reflect approximate original contours. The steepness of existing slopes is <br />characterized on Fig. 2. Slope heights range from about 200 to 250 feet. Area slopes <br />outside of excess spoil fills are mostly flatter than 3:1 (horizontal:vertical). The <br />maximum fill slope recommended is about 2:5:1. Erosion control and constructability <br />concerns could result in desired slope angles of about 3:1. Where existing slopes are <br />steeper than 2.5:1, post-mining slopes will need to be flatter. A variance may be <br />required. Design of post-mining topography will need to address this issue. <br />Excess Disposal Fills 4 through 9 <br />~ To characterize the spoil fills we estimated elevation and slope information as <br />shown on Fig. 1. Typical plan and section views are shown on Fig's. 3 and 4. The fill <br />heights range from about 50 feet to 250 feet (toe to crest) with the maximum thickness <br />of fill ranging from about 50 to 170 feet. The proposed geometry of the fill slopes is a <br />2.5:1 {horizontal:vertical) slope face, with 20-foot wide benches at 40-foot vertical <br />intervals. This results in an overall slope on the order of 3:1. <br />We estimated the average valley slope, maximum side slopes and volume to <br />compare to the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (CDMG) definition of Valley <br />Fills. For classification purposes, the area outside the extent of surface mining (shown <br />on Fig. 4) was used. For stability analysis the full height slope was used. A Valley Fill <br />is subject to specific underdrain size requirements and is defined by CDMG regulations <br />as "a fill structure consisting of any material other than coal waste and organic material <br />LORENCITO COAL COMPANY, LLC <br />LORENCITO SURFACE MINE • PHASE I <br />CTLR 32, 611 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.