My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE42191
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE42191
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:44:43 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:02:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997089
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/22/1998
Doc Name
PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Pre-Hearing Conference 5 January 12, 1998 <br />Stone Gravel Pit File No. M-97-089 <br />ATTACHMENT A...continued <br />Objections specific to application and notice requirements: <br />1. Application is incomplete (Bell, MPC, Slickman, Stills) <br />2. Exhibit C -- Mining Plan Map(s) -- is inadequate (Bell, MPC, Stills) <br />a. Total area to be mined not portrayed (Bell, Stills) <br />b. Entire area of affected lands not portrayed Istillsl <br />c. Details for mining units VI -XII and beyond are absent Istillsl <br />d. Details for mining units V -XII are absent IMPCI <br />e. Trailers, processing equipment and other facilities not indicated (MPCI <br />f. Existing roads not included as affected land Istillsl <br />g. Descriptions of proposed mining roads are absent IMPC, Stills) <br />e. No information offered to accurately visualize project IMPCI <br />3. Exhibit D -- Mining Plan -- is inadequate IMPC, stills) <br />a. Timetable for units I - IV do not address protection/study of cultural sites (Stills( <br />b. Timetable for mining units beyond unit IV are absent Istillsl <br />c. Identification/description of intended use of incidental products is absent Istillsl <br />d. Plan for cultural artifacts, as expected incidental products, is absent Istillsl <br />e. Total pit depth is unknown (MPCI <br />f. Total height of overburden and topsoil piles are unknown IMPCI <br />g. Size of trucks utilized is unknown IMPCI <br />4. Exhibit E -- Reclamation Plan -- is inadequate (Bell, st7llsl <br />a. Comparison of pre-mining land use and PMLU is absent (stills) <br />b. Recreation and wildlife PMLU not discussed even though BLM manages land under "multiple <br />use" which includes recreation and wildlife, absent recreation and wildlife PMLU are grounds <br />for permit denial under § 34-32.5-115(4)(8), C.R.S., application does not conform to the <br />requirement of § 34-32.5-116, C.R.S. Istillsl <br />c. Reclamation Plan inadequate for dry dusty climate 16e1q <br />d. Obligation to establish a soil stabilizing cover is absent, submitted plan is not aperformance- <br />based plan (Bell) <br />e. Poor success of previous mining reclamation (Bell, Emerson, Morris) <br />f. Destruction of public lands (Bell, Emerson, Morris, Slickman, Trost) <br />5. Exhibit F -- Reclamation Plan Map -- is inadequate !stills) <br />a. Details of final topography are absent, only 1 contour line indicated (Stills) <br />b. Final land use for each portion of affected land is not portrayed Istillsl <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.