My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE42095
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE42095
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:44:37 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:01:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Sections 9, 10, 11, 12
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 05 Archaelogical Part 5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OBJECTIVES <br />The primary objective of the field survey was to locate and evaluate <br />all instances of historic and prehistoric resources within the designated <br />survey areas. All such occurrences were to be identified and, if older <br />than 50 years of age, recorded and evaluated for National Register of <br />Historic Places eligibility. Existing cultural resource data and the RP3 <br />context would form the basis for evaluating a given resource property's <br />importance toward filling gaps in the current knowledge of the area's <br />cultural resource picture. <br />A secondary goal of the work was to confirm the apparent patterning <br />for both historic and prehistoric sites that had accrued from previous <br />cultural resource surveys, including limited use of the area by aborig- <br />inal groups, co-location of sites with water resources, and ephemeral use <br />of the area in historic times by ranchers. <br />METHODOLOGY <br />4lhenever possible, parallel pedestrian sweeps, 20-30 m apart, were <br />employed to cover the survey tracts. Two situations worked against this <br />procedure in some zones of the survey tracts. The first was vegetation, <br />especially in the lease addition tract where grass and brush were so <br />dense that visibility of the ground surface, and sometimes access, were <br />nearly impossible (see Figure 3). The second type of setting precluding <br />intensive inspection was steep hillsides, particularly when combined with <br />• dense vegetation. Generally speaking, all areas where ground visibility <br />was possible were inspected and slopes exceeding 30% were not intensively <br />surveyed. All areas that appeared to be less than 30% on the topographic <br />map were checked to see if survey was possible. In this manner, all <br />areas of potential site location were intensively checked and other <br />lesser attractive zones were reconnoitered. Intensive coverage was <br />possible for most of the conveyor belt corridor except where steeper <br />slopes were encountered. <br />RESULTS <br />Three types of cultural resources were encountered by the survey, <br />historic trash scatters, isolated finds. and sites. These are described <br />as follows: <br />Historic Trash Scatters <br />Several instances of scattered historic trash, mainly rusted tin <br />cans were noted but not formally recorded because they appear to be <br />generally less than 50 years of age. The locations of these scatters <br />are shown in Figures I and 2. Invariably, these scatters are found on <br />the higher points of ridges and in upland settings. As such, they un- <br />doubtedly represent the remains of campsites associated with animal <br />husbandry, either sheep or cattle. Most of these scatters appear to date <br />• <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.