Laserfiche WebLink
° iYV VYuYlin~ ,+IIYYV ~YrIIVYI <br />, <br />i,l i <br />. ~~~ ~ Cultural Resources Mana~ent 65 <br />i <br />'s ' <br />.~ •~rocedu'res already dra~ted by which state initiate under- <br />•,f •, c e <br />~~ pgs affecting register d sites, whether state-owne~ or not, <br />o be mitigated. ~ ~ <br />I;,~ n ~ <br />~.. <br />j ;; he long-range goal is ;to see to it that all sites on- <br />+! <br />~utinq t!~ the cultural t~ ritage of the nation, states end <br />n <br />Ir <br />ll le are listed n the S to Register to insure that roper <br />"I ~ I' ~ <br />iderat~on is afforded ~ em when state agencies coot mplate <br />' ~~ ., <br />on affecting them. ~ ~ <br />i <br />~ 3 <br />° <br />oral Resources Managem°nt: <br />ironmenxal Assessments ~ 1 <br />M {~ 4 53 <br />National Environmental~Policy Act established a na ~ional <br />4 + ~ 1~ <br />tore to ensure the resolution of conflicting nationarl objec- <br />t; '! t <br />~, ea in sack a way as to pxovide the greatest gold for the <br />r,.r <br />ateat namber of people c~er the longest period of tune. The <br />€sions are usually made used on current values for ~ny <br />en project, those values generally fluctuating with the <br />e.i y <br />des -one time the achie~, ment of social objectives b~ing <br />~ ~ <br />I ~ important, the next, oerhaos energy considerations <br />'~ ~ r E <br />~~ i(But, in assessing envirr~nmental impacts on culturalzassets, <br />t' - <br />difficulty lies not necgssarily in ~oeighing social end eco- <br />i <br />'ic values against cultural values but in establishing the in- <br />'~nsic worthiness of the c~ltural assets themselves. ~onse- <br />~"' ~` <br />ntly, environmental assessments continue to stress tike eco- <br />^ <br />is worth of cultural res~'urces to men rather than their fun- <br />.r ~ <br />:; ~~ c ~ <br />~. <br />~ 8 <br />N ,~ ° ! <br />I• ±~ <br />1 <br />I <br />