My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE42052
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE42052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:44:35 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:00:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/22/1989
Doc Name
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES INC OPPOSITION TO APPLICATION NO M-88-112
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />and agreed to by Battle Mountain. This is mandatory to <br />compliance with the statute. If rinsing will not neutralize the <br />heap leach, then Battle Mountain will be required to dispose of <br />this material pursuant to state and federal hazardous waste <br />requirements. <br />B. Battle Mountain Has Failed To Demonstrate That. Erosion <br />Control Measures Will Be Maintained During Reclamation. <br />Neither Battle Mountain's permit application c~.or later <br />correspondence (Point Nos. 48-57) have addressed whether sediment <br />traps, culverts and diversion drainages will be maintained as <br />necessary for 30 years into the future while the disturbed areas <br />revegetate and are reclaimed. The failure to commit to such <br />maintenance will undoubtedly result in erosion of the declaimed <br />areas, contrary to C.R.S. § 34-32-116(7)(1). Battle Mountain <br />should be required to report to MLRD any breach of a berm or <br />sediment trap, or release of any materials into the environment. <br />C. Battle Mountain Does Not Plan To Reclaim The ~'wo Mini <br />Pits To Their Original Contours So That The Lind Can <br />Returned To Range. <br />MLRD staff has suggested in Point Nos. 60, 61 and 69 <br />that the west mine pit be backfilled to an elevation of` 8600 feet <br />and that Battle Mountain restore the east mine pit to original <br />contours. The west pit should be backfilled to grade toecause of <br />the significant water infiltration into the west mine pit and the <br />-11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.