My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE41947
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE41947
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:44:30 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:58:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/8/2005
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operation and Reclamation Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West Elk Mine <br />• 4. In the unlikely event that cracks do develop within the internal portions of the panels, there <br />are various "healing" mechanisms which will act to fill in the crack within a few months. <br />5. Although surface cracks located over the pillars are less likely to "heal" themselves, they <br />will fill in over time via "sealing" mechanisms, principally in the form of sediment <br />inflows. <br />6. Most spring flows which infiltrate into surface cracks will re-emerge downgradient; <br />consequently, the water will not be "lost" to the basin, which is important from a water <br />rights standpoint. <br />In short, it is very unlikely that the rechazge source for any given alluviallcolluvial spring or spring <br />itself will encounter a surface crack. If this does happen, however, the ameliorating factors listed <br />above will apply. <br />Redrnrk , rinvc -From the information available, roughly one third of the springs in the permit <br />area can be considered bedrock springs. All of the springs associated with formations are located <br />well above the projected E-Seam fractured zone; consequently, these springs will not be measurably <br />effected by fractures extending up from the mine workings. As noted above, if the relevant <br />formations fall within the caved zone or the lower portion of the fractured zone, the springs maybe <br />lost and the rechazge water may enter the mine workings. Springs associated with the upper portion <br />of the fractured zone may be either lost into the mine workings or they may relocate to a lower <br />• elevation. <br />Although highly unlikely, consider an example in which 50 percent of the springs in the Apache <br />Rocks and Box Canyon permit revision areas are in the caved and fractured zone. hi this very <br />conservative scenario, the spring recharge water would drain into the mine workings. The <br />implications of this scenario are not significant. <br />The maximum number of springs that would be lost under this scenario within the Apache <br />Rocks permit revision azea is 7 and in the Box Canyon permit revision azea the number is <br />2. <br />2. The combined dischazge of the relevant springs is, conservatively, 50 gpm. This <br />represents less than 10 percent of the total spring dischazges ui the current permit and Box <br />Canyon permit revision azeas, <br />3. The source water for these springs would be dischazged into the mine workings. Losses <br />within the mine workings are estimated to be less than 5 percent. The remaining 95 <br />percent of the inflow water would therefore be collected, treated and dischazged to the Dry <br />Fork or the North Fork. <br />Bedrock springs could potentially be impacted by surface cracks, but the logic presented in the <br />previous section for colluviaUalluvial springs applies to bedrock springs also. Simply stated, there <br />• is no significant risk to bedrock springs from surface cracks. <br />2.05-166 November 2004 PR! 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.