Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mine <br />I. <br />~. <br />2. "Observations made underground by the staff of the Division at mines in the region showed <br />that the coal seams aze poor aquifers with very low transmissivities." (p. 7). <br />3. "Fracturing only minimally improves the water bearing qualities of the discontinuous <br />sandstones and shales overlying the mines. Some fractures and faults transect the Mesaverde <br />Formation and extend vertically to the surface. These faults and fractures produce narrow <br />bands of secondary porosity within the rock strata. Due to the low permeability of the rock <br />strata within the Mesaverde Formation, these faults and fractures provide the primary path <br />through which water flows both vertically between rock straw and horizontally within rock <br />strata." (p. 7). <br />This statement is generally true, except that in the eastern portion of the West Elk Mine (B East <br />Mains and 14SE Headgate) afracture/fault system was of sufficient size and storage capacity to <br />generate initial inflow rates of approximately 2,500 and 8,000 gpna, respectively. As is typical of <br />fracture-controlled reservoirs in the oil industry and as MCC has experienced with other inflows in <br />the mine, these inflows reduced to a fraction of the initial inflow rates over time - 80 gpm in the <br />case of the B East Mains Fault, which is about 3 percent of the initial flow rate. The 14SE <br />Headgate inflow also reduced to less than 3 percent of the initial <br />It is important to contrast the amount and nature of surface cra <br />mining versus room-and-pillaz mining. Based upon cazeful fieldu <br />above the West Elk Mine's 1NW through 7NW longwall panels, ] <br />longwall mining in this setting produces very few surface cracks, <br />they aze located only in areas of maximum stress and aze likely <br />discussion regarding the frequency.("risk") of surface cracks based <br />is provided in Section 2.05.6, Surface Water Quantity Effects, Strec <br />the probability of any given channel in the Apache Rocks and Bc <br />encountering a crack is 0.2 percent, (see calculations in discussion <br />Streams) and that the total annual loss of surface flow to cracks will <br />rate of 8,000 gpm. <br />:king associated with longwall <br />spections of the ground surface <br />~Ir. Dunrud has determined that <br />nd that when cracks do appeaz, <br />:o "seal" themselves. Detailed <br />upon inspection of these panels <br />ms. This section concludes that <br />~ Canyon permit revision azeas <br />entitled Analysis of Impacts to <br />be of no practical significance. <br />4. "Inflows from faults and fractures located outside stream valleys generally dry up with time or <br />flow intermittently at discrete points along the fault or fracture'. Those which continue to flow <br />have flow rates which diminish to a trickle. Such inflows may represent the de-watering of <br />lenticulaz sandstone units with limited recharge areas or may 'represent flows through fracture <br />zones extending to the surface which have narrow rechazge zonies on steep slopes." (p. 8). <br />In every case, inflows have rapidly diminished to a fraction of the initial inflows or in many cases <br />have ceased entirely. In the cases of the B East Mains fault and the 14SE Headgate fault, inflows <br />encountered in March 1996 and January 1997, respectively, the inflows decreased to about 3 <br />percent of the maximum observed inflow rates after a few months. <br />5. "Preliminary aquifer tests were performed by Mountain Coal Company...and they indicate that <br />the F-Seam and lenticulaz sandstones of the Barren Member are poor aquifers at best, as <br />groundwater flow is mainly concentrated in fractured rock." (p. 8). <br />1.05-145 <br />November 1004 PRI / <br />