Laserfiche WebLink
~• Rate and duration of subsidence above longwall mining panels, therefore, are a function of mining <br />rate. The faster and more uniformly the longwall mining occurs, the less time any surface cracks <br />present will be open to potentially impact surface or ground water. <br />The duration of subsidence above room-and-pillaz mines; however, is less predictable because not <br />all pillars aze removed. For example, in Figure 8 of Exhibit 60, subsidence at a given point (p) was <br />only about 60 percent complete after mining was completed within the area of influence of the <br />point. <br />Results of Computer Modeling <br />A computer softwaze package was used to model the results of subsidence measurements at the <br />West Ells Mine and to project subsidence amounts in the Apache Rocks and Box Canyon mining <br />azeas. The package used is entitled "Comprehensive and Integrated Subsidence Prediction Model <br />(CISPM)," Version 2.0, by Syd S. Peng and Yi Luo, Department ofjMining Engineering, College of <br />Mineral and Energy Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV. This program <br />performed an influence function analysis and best fit of the West Elk Mine subsidence data. The fit <br />between the data points and the influence function output from the model are shown in Figure 6, <br />Exhibit 60. Considering that there was some F-Seam influence on the B-Seam subsidence data, the <br />actual subsidence measurements and subsidence profiles predicted by the influence function model <br />compare favorably. <br />• Once the computer program was calibrated to the West Elk Mine subsidence data, subsidence was <br />projected into the Apache Rocks and the Box Canyon mining areas for the various overburden <br />depths and mining sequences in order to obtain an independent check on the subsidence projections <br />based on the conceptual model (Table 1 and Figure 6, Exhibit 60).~ Comparison of the two models <br />shows that subsidence values above the chain pillars and panel centers of the computer model for <br />the Apache Rocks mining area aze approximately at the median point of the conceptual model data <br />presented for the eastern and western panels (Table 2 and Figures 7a and 7b, Exhibit 60). <br />Subsidence above the chain pillars and panel centers for the Boz Canyon mining azea is also at <br />about the median point of the conceptual model for the first fourl,panels (Table 3 and Figure 7C, <br />Exhibit 60). The conceptual model subsidence prediction results ace presented in ranges that make <br />it more conservative than the computer model results. <br />Effects of Topogranhv on Subsidence Processes <br />In contrast to subsidence of rock units behaving asfixed-end, laterally constrained, multiple plates, <br />subsidence in steep topography will typically occur Cnon-fixed end, laterally unconstrained <br />multiple plates (rock units). This lack of lateral confinement may locally cause: <br />• Reversals of horizontal displacement and excessive tensile ;strain on steep slopes. Peng and <br />Hsuing (1986) found that horizontal displacement is affected by slopes greater than 20 <br />percent. Displacements on steep slopes and cliffs can cause cracks to open more along <br />• faults, fractures, and joints than would occur in subdued top,'ography where the rock units are <br />2.05-123 March 2005PR1 / <br />f .~ <br />'l <br />