Laserfiche WebLink
<br />granted the permit. See finding (2) in permit, which is in <br />the record. <br />LIIhGLSlSZIIy <br />Plaintiffs are upset because there is a grave- mining <br />operation in the vicinity of their home. The gravel oper- <br />ation Mi75 started up in 1971. Plaintiffs moved into the <br />house in 1976 and bought the house two years later. Now <br />they want to Shut down a lawfully permitted business oper- <br />ation. All the allegations of the complaint and of the <br />motion f'or summary judgment relate to trivial and insubstan- <br />tial alleged irreyularities, none of which is fatal to the <br />proceedings by the board in issuing the permit. The evidence <br />in the record overwhelminyly supports the board's decision. <br />This court, according deference to the factfinders below, <br />should dismiss plaintiffs' complaint. <br />- 12- <br />