Laserfiche WebLink
' been degraded by extensive streambank erosion (Crane 1997). <br />Results of this degradation noted in the study include: <br />Reduced riparian and wetland ecosystem function, loss of <br />. wildlife habitat, property loss, destruction of the <br />fisheries, relocation of existing irrigation diversions, <br />bridge scoure, reduction of bedload transport, decreased <br />late season flows, increase in flood damage, reduced water <br />quality. The study recounted historical changes in the river <br />since white settlement. According to an early settler, Esra <br />Wade, in 1882 most of the valley near Paonia was covered <br />with cottonwood, skunkbush, willow, and buffa loberry. He <br />wrote that the river -was very crooked, which lessened its <br />fall, therefore did not cut its banks, but spread over a <br />large portion of the valley during high water time, and <br />deposited sand and rich soil from the high country, making <br />the valley soil, in places, very rich. Later on the ranchers <br />began cutting these curves in the river and t hen the trouble <br />began...- (Crane 1997) Many different types of disturbance <br />resulting from development in the valley have led to the <br />existing condition of the North Fork. Efforts to control <br />flooding and bank erosion, removal of riparian vegetation, <br />irrigation diversions, gravel mining, upstream dams, <br />cultivation and grazing have all contributed t o <br />channelization and entrenchment of the river, decrease of <br />sinuosity, high width/depth ratio, and inability to carry <br />its bedload. The challenge now is to meet cur rent needs and <br />future demands for traditional uses while restoring the <br />health of the river and the entire ecosystem (Crane 1997). <br />. Some excellent recommendations for flood management and <br />floodplain restoration are included in the .morphological <br />report. These include removing existing levee s and dikes <br />farther away from the active channel, and increasing wetland <br />a'nd riparian forest habitat within the widened floodplain. <br />Further development on the floodplains of the river and its <br />tributaries, and in wetlands should be discouraged. Crane <br />concludes: "the way to reduce flooding in one area is to <br />promote flooding in others...store floods on their <br />floodplains"(Crane 1997). By encouraging flooding in some <br />areas, the natural ecosystem processes necessary to maintain <br />the cottonwood-willow community can be restored, while other <br />areas are protected from flooding. In addition to the NFRIA, <br />other local groups have taken an interest in restoration of <br />specific sites on the North Fork. This is .an encouraging <br />development. It is important that the morphological and <br />hydrological Characteristics.of each site be t aken into <br />account so that restoration efforts will be 1 asting. The <br />1997 study will be extremely valuable for evaluating the <br />potential for restoration.. Revegetation of the floodplain <br />can be accomplished using native plant specie s mentioned <br />above. Existing cottonwood and willow communities should be <br />preserved and enhanced, while non-native species can <br />gradually be eliminated. This will be a long-term <br />commitment, but the motivation exists in Delt a County for <br />beginning restoration now. <br />;~NVIRO.FACTORS: <br />CNELEV: 5100 MAXELEV: 6000 <br />