My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE41036
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE41036
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:43:50 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:36:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 10A CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY JUMBO MOUNTAIN TRACT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ <br />• Vegetation is variable and responsive to local exposure and soil development. Charaaeristic <br />communities are aspen woodland in protected settings, oak chaparral in open, exposed settings, and <br />pine-juniper woodland on steep (especially north facing) slopes. Generally, the undergrowth is open or <br />patchy with extensive exposure of soil surface and bedrock outcrops. Oak and brush thickets may be <br />locally dense, but tend not to be extensive. However, in wet, protected areas with deep sediment, the <br />undergrowth in the aspen groves is often both high and thick, making these locations nearly impassable. <br />Edible and useful plant products are seasonally abundant, and all these plant communities provide gootl <br />forage and cover for game animals. Limfting faaors for cultural settlement or use are ruggedness of <br />access and availability of water. <br />Existing Data and Literature Review <br />Prior to fieldwork the Colorado Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP) was <br />contacted, on June 8, to obtain current information on previous cultural resource investigations and <br />recorded cultural resource sites in the project area. The results of this files search for the legal sections <br />containing the project areas were that two previous Class III inventories had been conducted in portions <br />of these sections. These were a Forest Service survey of several proposed ponds and trails (Sanders <br />1982), and a previous MAC survey for exploratory drill holes in this same general area (Spath 1992). MAC <br />has also conducted several other small inventories in the West Elk Mountains (e.g., Metcalf 1987, 1989) <br />and results have generally been negative. <br />This project area is located in an area of effective overlap of the West-Central Colorado Prehistoric <br />Context (Reed 1987) and the Colorado Mountains Prehistoric Context (Guthrie, et al., 1984). Neither study <br />area has yielded evidence of frequent prehistoric use of the scrub oak vegetation zone during any of the <br />• prehistoric time periods. The earliest documented historic visit to the general area was the Dominguez- <br />Escalante expedition of 1776 that passed along the North Fork of the Gunnison (Warner 1976:29). The <br />area was within the range of Eurc-American fur trapping activities in the early 1800s and was later <br />influenced by ranching, fruit farming and the expansion of coal mining (Mehls 1982). Historic activities <br />in the area that would leave more than limited, transitory traces have generally centered along the river <br />valleys. <br />Field Methods <br />The objective of this investigation was to identify and evacuate any cultural resources that might <br />be affected by the proposed undertaking. Each area of effect was inspected by pedestrian survey. This <br />pedestrian survey covered roughly one-half acre around each of the three proposed drill pad sites, <br />approximately 700 feet of 50 toot wide corridor for access construction (ca. 0.8 acres), and approximately <br />3,500 feet of reconnaissance along existing trails that may require minor improvement for access. The <br />latter minor improvements may include removing a few trees, cutting back overhanging branches, or <br />expedient tilling or drainage improvement at poorly drained, muddy stretches. <br />The basic approach to the proposed drill pad sites was to cover an area within an 85 to 100 toot <br />(25-30 m) radius around the staked drill location, but actual area surveyed varied in response to local <br />conditions. Given the general ruggedness of the terrain, the entire landform practical for drilling activities <br />around each staked location, up to about 200 feet from the staked location, was inspected for potential <br />cultural resources. This included all reasonably level ground around the drill pad site and excluded dense <br />stands of trees or brush. Inventory was completed by a single investigator walking zig-zag pedestrian <br />iransects spaced approximately five to ten meters apart. The ground surface was inspected for any <br />• ., <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.