My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE41011
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE41011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:43:49 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:36:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/15/2006
Section_Exhibit Name
KII 2.04.9 Soil Resource Information
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
residuum overlying sandstone on hills, ridges, and mountainsides. <br />The soil test pit revealed a very shallow five inch deep stony loam profile <br />underlain by sandstone. Salvage of suitable plant growth material from <br />this soil unit may be problematic, and this unit should not be relied on <br />to provide a dependable quantity of plant growth material for <br />reclamation, if disturbed. <br /> <br />Suitability of Soils for Reclamation <br />Appendix 6 contains the results of soil analysis for the three soil series <br />encountered in the soil resource inventory. Also included in the <br />Appendix is a compilation of soil horizon suitability criteria for <br />reclamation. The following summary table addresses those soil <br />parameters identified in Rule 2.04.9. <br />Soil Parameter H EC SAR Texture <br />Umbarg (range) 6.94- 0.3-0.7 0.5-0.6 Sandy loam- Loam <br />Umbarg (mean) 7.38 0.47 0.53 <br /> <br />Lazear (range) 7.1-7.62 0.3-0.5 0.6-1.2 Clay-Sandy clay <br />Lazear (mean) 7.44 0.4 0.93 <br /> <br />Sanchez 6.56 0.4 0.7 Sandy clay loam <br /> <br />Suspect Levels <5.5 or >g.0 > 16.0 <br />Based on the results of sampling, none of the soil series has limitations <br />for plant growth based on the parameters specified in Rule 2.04.9 and <br />guidelines from five western states. <br />With regard to other parameters evaluated, the following samples <br />exceeded suspect levels for the identified parameters, or were below <br />deficiency levels for nitrogen, phosphorus, or potassium. <br />The Umbarg 2 sample was slightly below the deficiency level for nitrate <br />nitrogen (4.2 ppm with 2% organic matter). This can be corrected with <br />fertilizer or amendments during reclamation. <br />Both Lazear samples revealed deficient levels of phosphorus in sampling <br />(2.5 an 0.6 ppm). As with nitrate-nitrogen this can be corrected with <br />fertilizer or amendments during reclamation. <br />All samples showed iron levels well above suspect levels identified by <br />Munshower as potentially inhibitory to vegetation. As no symptoms of <br />0/O/L//G/M/N/A//~6/N/®/~9/E1/Wl0/W/Lf/M/b'/M/N/4% /P/!O/Y/4/N/b/i/N/O/Y/N/9/!1/9/O/4/4/4/dJ/tl/0iN/N/tl/O/6/Y/%B/ll/4% /tl/4/a/L+/O/tl/O/tl/B'/O/9/tl/O/P/tl/®//O/A+/e <br />National King Coal, LLC King II Mine <br />Section 2.04.9 <br />Page 2 October, 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.