My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE40895
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE40895
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:43:43 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:33:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/7/2003
Doc Name
Condition #2
From
GCC Rio Grande Inc
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FAX <br />7anuary 5, 2001 <br />T0: -Jamie Gaboriau Fax # (303) 716-5299 <br />FROM: Tony Waldron <br />RE: Weed Control Plans <br />Attached, per your request, is a copy of the Division's Weed Control Policy and a weed <br />control plan that was accepted for a surface clay mine in Elbert County. Typically a <br />weed control plan should include the following components: <br />1. Target species- The Division's primary area of concern here aze listed "Noxious <br />Weeds", such as those contained in the policy. However, some towns, cities, <br />counties, etc., contain weed ordinances concerning the height of weeds and <br />requiring lots to be mowed. This office normally ignores "common" annual <br />weeds on mine sites unless they have impacted desirable vegetative <br />establishment, in which case we may require some abatement of the weed concern <br />followed by additional efforts to establish desirable perennial vegetation (ie: re- <br />seeding with the approved seed mix). <br />In addition to identifying the tazget species, the size of the infestation would be <br />useful information so that a baseline can be established for monitoring purposes. <br />2. Control methods and treatment windows-This section should contain any and <br />all methods that will be used to control noxious weeds. This could include <br />mowing, plowing, handpulling, spraying, grazing, biological controls, etc., etc. In <br />fact an "integrated' approach to overall weed control on mine sites is desirable. <br />The Division is not asking for this information to restrict the operator in their <br />choice of control methods, however, we do need to know that your intended <br />control method will: (a) actually control the tazget species initially and in follow- <br />up treatments. For instance, mowing Canada thistle each year in August after it <br />has seeded would not be considered an acceptable control method. Mowing <br />throughout the growing season or mowing in eazly June followed by a fall <br />herbicide treatment would be considered an acceptable method. (b) not cause an <br />off-site or long lasting problem. For instance, if there are sensitive plants (such as <br />an orchazd) adjacent to the treatment azea, we would want to know what <br />chemicals are being used in case off-site damage occurs or, if there is an irrigation <br />canal neazby that could receive runoff from a treated area or, if the post-mining <br />land use is cropland and the application rates are too high, etc., etc. This section <br />simply allows the Division to ascertain that the treatment methods are reasonable <br />and prudent. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.