My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE40830
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE40830
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:43:40 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 10:31:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/2/2006
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 18B Evaluation of Potential Groundwater Inflows Associated w/E Seam Mining
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayo and Associates, LC <br />• <br />~• <br />4 <br />The 3H content of Big Bear spring (14 to 17 TU) indicates appreciable contributions of <br />modern rechazge wafer, however, the relatively low'4C content (i.e., ~ 55 pmc) suggest <br />that the base flow component of Big Bear Spring contains older water. The 3H content of <br />Birch is appreciable less (< 0.5 TU) and the water has a14C age of 1,000 to 3,600 years. <br />Thus, Birch Spring dischazges from a groundwater system that is mostly ancient water <br />that mixes with a minor component of modem rechazge. The disparate groundwater ages <br />of the two spring waters indicate that groundwater systems in individual damage zones of <br />the Pleasant Valley Fault aze not in hydraulic communication with each other. <br />Groundwater collected from in mine wells in the Spring Canyon Member, which is <br />located above the Panther Member, had "C ages of 900 to 2,000 years and contained <br />essentially no 3H. Thus, theses waters are ancient and aze not in communication with Big <br />Bear Spring. The old component of Spring Canyon Member water is similar in age to the <br />old component of Birch Spring. However, hydrodynamic communication between the <br />Spring Canyon and Panther Members is unlikely, because the potentiometric surface of <br />the Spring Canyon Member is several hundred feet higher than the potentiometric surface <br />in the Panther Member (Mayo and Associates, 1999a). Additionally the Storrs Member, <br />which is located between the Spring Canyon and Panther Members, has an intermediate <br />potentiometric surface. <br />3.5 Skyline Mine (Wasatch Plateau, Utah) <br />Skyline Mine began coal mining in 1981. Coal has been mined from Mines 3, and 2. <br />Mine 2 was formerly known as Mine 1. Mine 3, located in the northern portion of the <br />Evaluation of Potential Groundwater Inflows 45 <br />Associated with E Seam Mining, <br />West Elk Mine, Somerset, Colorado <br />February 24, 2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.