Laserfiche WebLink
conformed with the requirements of Rule 6.2(1). CES, thus, has no <br />basis upon which to argue that it was denied due process. <br />CONCLIIBION <br />For the reasons set forth above, Battle Mountain requests that <br />the court enter an order affirming the decision of the MLRB. <br />REQIIEST FOR ORAL 7-RGIIIiENT 7-ND ESPEDITED HEARING <br />Pursuant to Rule 121, Section 1-15, of the Colorado Rules of <br />Civil Procedure, Battle Mountain requests that this matter be set <br />for oral argument. Because the proposed mining operations involve <br />the coordination of numerous contractors and t~ecause the <br />commencement of such operations are highly dependent upon seasonal <br />weather conditions, Battle Mountain requests immediate disposition <br />of this case pursuant to the same Rule 121, Section 1-•15 4 of the <br />Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure. <br />Respectfully submitted this ~ day of Novemt~er, 1989. <br />PARCEL, MAURO, HULT~N 5 SPAANSTRA, P.C. <br />Dean as~e- 662 <br />Mar quarrell - ~M9972 <br />1801 California Street <br />Suite 3600 <br />Denver, Colorado 80202 <br />(303) 292-6400 <br />Attorneys for Defendant <br />Battle Mountain Resources, Inc. <br />- 3'7 - <br />