PERMFILE40316

• Permit No: C1981071
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 12/11/2001
• Section_Exhibit Name: RN APPLICATION FORMS & LETTERS
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Colorado Yampa Coal Company
~.
29588 Roult County Road M27.Oak Creek, CO 80467 • [phone].
;S:`.
June 12., 1986 -

OCT 2 q 1986
Mr. Dan Mathews
Reclamation. Specialist.
Colorado Mined Land' Reclamation
423 Centennial Building
1313 Sherman Street
Denver;"Colorado •80203
r
Divisieti ~ C~ii3• ~~t• of Vtziurrl.`~G~C:!;::~
RE: Permit, Renewal Application,. Permit No.=~C-B'Y-071% •=
Dear Mr.. Mathews,
Attached, please find five copies of Ehe` "dracft" renewal .
application along with two sets of ' informa-tioli -3s required' by _
Rule 2.b8.5. (2) (6).. The required number' of 'sets was given"~'1`2i"" ,
• your letter;:: of March 11, 1986. As stated ;on :the applicatiosr~.Y'
form, CYCC'''-is requesting atn addditional;;=r-five :yeai-': permit_ term
through this'renewal''applica~tion. _ .. -
in order to provide the applicant with dix~ction=,` tkse CMLRD
provided a~:draft renewal application 'form in:t2ie letter of Marvh. ~ -
11, 1986,' This form` was. used in•:formulating CYCC's'.ienew~"Y _-.
package.: However, rQCently the CMLRD has. issued. an updated:
version.. of the draft`'~enewal applicatiotr:': CYCC:;; has .,used th~.s.
version,""but only to the extent that it `-addre§se3' the informa-
tional requirements contained in the o,rig•ina.~.::dr.aft' This was`~.'•
done due to the. fact tha~~not enough time was available ~to.~
compare the two forms and make the appropriate.modifcation's~':•_~.. .
However;.. both of these 'ar'e draft forms and not; approved .~y:-the =~~
Board at this time; so the~tYl`' •of ~rh~~'a~_eome~ll~t~-~
suspect.. - - .. r. _ ..
~~renewal applicatioa is an updating . of. the "Permit :~-81•= ~ \
071 and a request for an additional five year.pe*:tiit term.=.: The
approved changes to the permit have been...incgrgarated ..~;ntds :the :'
package. However, i5 there were `a number of,.chahge~•applyi$g'to ,
a certain .procedure approved during. th,e:.existing_.permit. ~ern4;,. ,
then only the most rece.ntly,:approved change has been i`ncFuded -in
the .package. This was done." to reduce the ~onfusion~ :tk~d't'~-might
arise .during the CMLRD's review of'the application: _ ~,
" .
•