Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />12/20/79 Memo, n. 2, #8 <br />r~ <br />"8. Two different sets of assumptions were used to <br />size sediment storage. For all ponds except pond A, <br />three different values were used as the CP (VM) factor <br />in the Universal Soil Loss Equation; one for base land, <br />one for early reclamation, and one for natural or fully <br />reclaimed land. For pond A, only two values were used <br />for the CP factor. The applicant should clarify how <br />these values are obtained and used. Which set of <br />calculation are more conservative? For how many years <br />is an area in each state of reclamation?" <br />The VM factor was used by LRCWE in the USLE <br />sediment calculations in lieu of the C and P <br />factors. C and P factors are related to crop and <br />agricultural practices, while VM is related to <br />vegetation and mechanical practices, which is more <br />appropriate for reclamation of surface mines. <br />The VM factors which were used by LRCWE came from <br />a reference provided us by EFC (See p. 11 of <br />Exhibit 13). The National Cooperative Highway <br />Research Program, in 1976 reported VM factors <br />which range from 1.30 for bare soil compacted by <br />bulldozer to 0.01 for permanently seeded areas <br />after 12 months. <br />LRCWE assigned a value of 0.05 for undisturbed <br />areas and areas which had been reclaimed for <br />longer than 12 months. From the attached refer- <br />ence, which reports the 1976 VM factors as CS <br />factors, this corresponds to seeded areas from 2 <br />to 12 months, and is conservative beyond that. A <br />value of 0.40 was used for areas in the first year <br />of reclamation. This corresponds to seedings 0 to <br />60 days old, and is also conservative beyond 60 <br />days. Any areas which were still bare were assigned <br />1.0. This would correspond to a freshly disked <br />bare soil, which is conservative for any reclamation <br />practice which tends to decrease sediment yield, <br />such as contour plowing. <br />At the Eckman Park site values of 1.0 and 0.05 <br />only were used, since in the worst case year of <br />1980, which was used in the hydrologic analysis, <br />there was no first year reclamation. This will <br />