Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-4- <br />Approval of this mining and reclamation plan does not. <br />constitute approval to leave the mine benches, terraces, and <br />fill areas ungraded after mining of federally-owned coal is <br />completed. The operator will comply with the requireinents'of <br />30 CFR 717.14 {a) to backfill with all available mate~-fals'to <br />achieve the lowest practicable grade and stable drainage through- <br />out the disturbed area. The operator may submit evidence that <br />supports alternative post-mining land surface config~ratioh at <br />anytime and such will be reviewed as will any other amendment to <br />an approved plan. The evidence will include a straightforward <br />demonstration of the manner in which the requirements of 30 CFR <br />717 and Section 516 (b) of Public law 95-87 will be met, with <br />special emphasis on the requirements of § 516 (b) (9~ and '516 <br />(b) (10) of the Pubic Law (91 Stat 496 and 497). The demonstra- <br />tion will include appropriate instruments indicatingithat the <br />necessary long-term maintenance will be provided. <br />We also recommend inclusion of a stipulation requiriing the opera- <br />tor to develop an adequate policy for removal of sediment frrom,ponds. <br />The mining plan does not appear to commit the operator td routine clean- <br />out and such maintenance is most important. We also note that the <br />approval should require the sedimentation ponds to be in~place to re- <br />tain runoff occurring during operations carried out under the'~approved <br />plan. i <br />If these stipulations are included among those accompanying any <br />mine plan approvals, this office feels that compliance r~ith existing <br />Federal regulations will be better assured. <br />In view of the considerable concern reflected in cdmments from <br />residents of the area near the Orchard Valley Mine regarding ;the <br />amount of coal that can be safely removed, we believe it appropriate <br />to reiterate our previous comment (#9 in the Attachmentito our letter <br />of February 13, 1978) which noted the need fora subsurface monitoring <br />system over and beyond that surface subsidence monitoring system ad- <br />dressed in the mining plan. We believe that a structural monitoring <br />system should be implemented within the mine workings t' better define <br />the rack mechanics of the disturbed strata during opera~tions~ It fs <br />recognized that the surface monitoring system will, if (properly moni- <br />tored, warn of the surface effects of subsidence. However, we are <br />more concerned that the roof, ribs, and any pillars be'monitored by <br />more than visual methods. The purpose of the monitoring requirement <br />is both to monitor performance and project specifications for future <br />operations. Upon consultation with qualified mining engineers, we <br />strongly recommend that representative areas of the federally-owned <br />coal resource be instrumented at subsurface locations usin9~accepted <br />engineering methods. We recommend that you request the U. S. Bureau <br />ff <br />~, il~:I~il.lil~;~i~;~ ! 1 <br />