My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13434
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13434
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:41 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:41:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
3/21/1978
From
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROCTECTION AGENCY
To
US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.~ <br /> <br />-2- <br />3. Identification of locations where riprap will be placed in', <br />channels in both the disturbed and undisturbed areas and documentation <br />of the calculations utilized to estimate that channel velocity would <br />not be erosive after ripraping these locations. <br />4. Drainage from the coal load-out area, an area included under <br />the meaning of "disturbed area" in 30 CFR 715.17, will be directed <br />into a sedimentation pond(s) in compliance with the final interim regu- <br />lations published in the Federal Register on February 27, 1978. <br />We also understand that water harvesting of Stevens Gulch is not a <br />part of the mine plan under review and, therefore, that mine plan appro- <br />val would not include any approval of water harvesting procedures. <br />The redesigned mining plan, and additional information submitted <br />by CWI through early March of this year, shows that technically-valid <br />methods of predicting the affect on the surface hydrology have been <br />employed in those cases reviewed, though the presentations of analyses <br />and results could be more straight forward. We are pleased that CWa <br />is commited to pass all waters from the disturbed areas through sedi- <br />mentation ponds. We are pleased that CWI has proposed to reduce flows <br />to vegetation buffer strips such that erosion will not be increased. <br />Thus a number of 'our concerns about the impact on the hydrologic system <br />have been lessened and will be further lessened if an adequate hydrolo- <br />gic monitoring system is also stipulated in an approval of a mining; plan. <br />In some instances, the monitoring is required to ensure that the appli- <br />cant's design assumptions are valid. In others, the monitoring is re- <br />quired to warn of unforeseen problems. <br />The monitoring systems we feel should be stipulated must include <br />the following: <br />1. Flow-activated sampling for suspended solids upstream and at <br />the final discharge point of channels with sedimentation ponds and <br />recorded flow measurements. (The location and type of sampling wil'1 be <br />determined by site-specific conditions. EPA will be pleased to assist <br />with the design of the required network.) <br />2. Measurements of sediment accumulation in all sedimentation <br />ponds immediately after there has been flow from the channel or cul- <br />vert to the pond. <br />3. Installation of an erosion/deposition measuring system (e.g. <br />erosion pins) at: <br />a. All vegetation buffer strips. <br />b. Erosion-prone areas of all diversion channels. <br />c. Representative locations along natural drainage channels <br />which receive water from the disturbed area or which i <br />receive abnormal quantities of water from the undisturbed <br />areas. <br />JI ~ ,Iii~~dl,,~L~ilill <br />Uf6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.