Laserfiche WebLink
\~ <br />I ~~'I <br />I l <br />{ 'f~ ~.,, is ii_.~ j(1 ~ C~,u.iN,: ~.~, ~• ~ l ~ ~- ~ J <br />~'~1,'.<<;. <br />1. Pursuant to Section 783.14, maps should be provided of the regional and <br />site surface geology, strucCUral contour of the Cop of the coal seam <br />showing faults and outcrops, and :ui overburden map. <br />2. Copies sbould be provided of reports on noise levels at the Orchard Valley <br />(line [hat wore forwarded to Llic Isurenu n ,anc~llanagemunC. <br />3. Pursuant [o tiection 7ri4.12, provide resulCS of percolation CesCs in the <br />treatmcnC pL~nt oxidation pond. Provide water shed topography, and <br />specific calculations for the parl:inp, lo[ sedimentation pond. (taps 21 and <br />17 do not join due to the lack of scale rni flap 21. 'Che calculations <br />provided in Uie Apprndices are not adequate to evaluate compi.iance of the <br />existing seclimenta[ion ponds with the pcrinanent re};ulatory program. The <br />pertinent calculations should he presented in the text in a logical <br />manner. Adequate data to enable selective checkinJ; by the regulatory <br />authuri.ty should he included. Show relationship between conduit spillways <br />and upper limit of sediment scor:y;c v~d ensure that during dewatering, <br />sediment is no[ washed out. Provide [he results u[ surveying of these <br />ponds (to present) in a Form that facilitates analysis of sediment yields <br />and deliveries. <br />Provide additional information [hat shows why retention of the <br />sedimentation ponds will minimize disturbance to the hydrologic balance. <br />4. Pursuant to Section 783.25, provide a map showing the location of existing <br />wells in the area. <br />5. On map lA of Volume V, there are three blocks in the southwestern corner <br />of Section 24, and one block in the central part oP Section 31 immediately <br />east of Colorado 187 [hat are missing owner designation, please provide. <br />6. The answer given Sn response to the following question: <br />"'fhe application contains what could become a misleading sentence on <br />page 13: "i.n contrast, most streams in the LJes[ern United Sates <br />coal areas are ephemeral and would not qualify (as alluvial valley <br />floors)." Some streams that are ephemeral may be alluvial valley <br />floors." <br />Is not satisfactory, even if the quote is from the lJestcentral Colorado. <br />Regional GIS, it is misleading. Tlie Regional I:IS was prepared before the <br />definition of alluvial valley floors and their identification was <br />finalized. <br />7. The idlJl/4 and SIJI/4 of the Section 18 and SIJI/4 of Section 7 R911J, T135 '~ <br />needs to he intensively inventoried for cultural resources. It is our <br />understanding from tl~e reports that these areas were only sample surveyed. <br /> <br />