Laserfiche WebLink
<br />' • • <br />olorado Westmoreland, Inc. -5- <br />The permanent revcl;etatton prograio should be more clearly identified. <br />The proposed seeding mix has not been Jemons[ra[ed [o comply w1[h [he <br />regulatluus nor have adequate criteria been given [o Identify mulching <br />techniques at the times of fLnal. reclamation. Methods [o measure <br />revegetatlon success have not been identified. The soil testing plan <br />should be detailed. The bonding estimates should be revised to Include <br />backfllling and grading. The application should contain a demonstration <br />[ha[ [he waste materials are not potentially toxic-forming materials. <br />16. With respect [o Section 784.14, provide report(s) on results uF <br />monitoring discussions and sedimentation ponds. Provide adequate <br />justification of effects on hydrologic balance iF diversions and ponds <br />are retained as is proposed. 41hen discussing monitoring, [hc plan, under <br />•Section 784.14 refers b:u k to Sec[Lon 784.12, which then refers to <br />Section 784.14. Plrase de:;crlbe muni[orini; explici[l}'. The need for <br />further hydrologic analyses WLLL depend nu the maturlal submitted !n <br />response [o previously ltstrd Items. CLarify location of straw dikes and <br />dr.scrlho measures undr~rtnkrn to create and man for [hu vegetnCive buffers <br />(Map 13). <br />27. Pursuant to Section 784.2U, and 03:1's 1rrCtrr rn Cr.l of Septe:nbcr 14, <br />1979, provide currant results of subsidence mensoroinonts and n( general <br />subsidence theory to pro jest naCu rr and cr.tent and tnipac[ ui (roc to res <br />expected Co develop over p.uiels and, u][imatrly, mains. Felate these <br />projections Co structures, if anv, and rruewuble resource Lands, <br />(ncluding streams .vul overloud flow systems. Identify proposed <br />subsidence nwnl[oring program. <br />28. Identify disposition procedures, includlnl~ lnea[Inn of land fill and <br />status of applicable licenses therefore, fur non-coal. wastes. <br />29. Provide status report on ClJ['s efforts to reduce noise levels at [he mine <br />site including [he coal loadou[. Lden[t[y ambient sound lev els without <br />the mine, the impacts of the facllLt Les nn noise levels and mi[tga tl on <br />measure::. The analysis should Cake Into account the noise Impacts uC <br />warnl ng do vices on equipment. <br />30. Provide schedules for conveyor system to replace [ruck haul, lE such <br />conveyor is supposed [o he considered by the regulatory authorities <br />during the proposed permit term. <br />31. Pursuant [n Section 734.26, provide results of monL[ortng. <br />32. Pursua n[ Co ;r r_[Lun 7g ±.79, and s(ncc purl ions of thr_ North Fork Rlvcr <br />a re•llknly alluvial valley floors, [h r. text should idrn[i(y any affects <br />expected to he causrd by ~nlnLtg on [he essrn[tnl hydrologic functions of <br />the 1JorLh Fork Volley. Thr analysts should Sdrnt(fy farinlnti activities <br />in [he areas Lhat could he a((ec [ed. The :uialys L•: should, a[ this s[nge, <br />~i Lib 1.1 ~.~„ ii lf6, .i il~ . <br />