My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13404
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13404
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:40 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:41:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
11/5/1996
Doc Name
ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL STUDY EVALUATION OF THE STABILITY OF THE RECLAIMED SLOPES BOWIE 2 MINE BOWIE
From
DMG
To
DAVE BERRY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Memo to Dave Berry <br />Bowie No. 2 Additional Geotech Study <br />page 5 <br /> <br />unless the rock mass is retained as excavated. I suspect that this same <br />problem might be encountered to varying degree in other cuts throughout <br />the site. These slope situations are currently buttressed by the soil and <br />debris veneer of the large ancient landslide mass earlier identified by <br />Maxim Technologies. The deep excavation of the proposed benches will <br />first remove the soil buttress, potentially exposing meta-stable bedrock <br />faces analogous to those evidencing instability in the undisturbed <br />situation. Unless great care is exercised, these slopes will fail, <br />potentially catastrophically, as a result of removal of the soil and <br />landslide debris buttress. Further, they will be exposed to the <br />disturbance of near outcrop portal penetration, operational vibration, <br />hydrologic alterations, and exposure to increased temperature fluctuation. <br />All of these factors commonly contribute to mechanical destabilization of <br />a slope. <br />For purposes of Maxim's analyses, the primary subject of this <br />memorandum, the above concern implies a shortcoming in their analytical <br />assumptions. The general analyses performed in this study assume that <br />the bedrock is a uniform homogeneous material with strength properties <br />significantly higher than that of the reclaimed soil wedge. The excavated <br />bedrock bench is portrayed as a stable foundation into which the soil <br />wedge is placed. In other words, the failure scenarios are effectively <br />limited to the backfilled soil wedge. A "conventional circular stability <br />analysis" is ideally suited for such an analysis. Unfortunately, I suspect <br />that this basic assumption may be inappropriate in the situation <br />presented by the Bowie #2 mine site. At this site it is more likely that <br />the exposed bedrock is prone to failure along specific bedding planes and <br />joint faces. The mechanical frictional properties of the rock mass in <br />effect along these planes of weakness is significantly weaker than the <br />properties of the intact rock matrix determined by triaxial testing of a <br />minuscule rock specimen in a laboratory test cell. Further, analytical <br />techniques designed for wedge-type failure mechanisms should be <br />evaluated for comparative projections of potential bedrock instability <br />scenarios. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.