My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13379
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13379
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:39 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:41:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/10/1983
Doc Name
SENECA II W FN C-057-82
From
MLRD
To
SENECA COALS LIMITED
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Tom Wainwright -3- February 10, 1983 <br />There are obvious advantages to this proposal, since it considers more <br />than just herbaceous production and thus addresses one of the considerations <br />in approving a reduced shrub density (how to adjust the production standard). <br />The standard is also tailored to the primary post-mine land use (grazing) <br />since both forage quantity and quality are incorporated. <br />The major drawback is that, as presented, the standard would be based on <br />pre-mine conditions and would not reflect the annual variation in production, <br />which is the reasoning behind the reference area or historical record <br />requirements of the regulations. The proposal may have to be modified <br />somewhat for this reason. <br />4. The applicant proposes to rely primarily on natural reinvasion of woody <br />plants from live topsoil and woody vegetation communities adjacent to <br />disturbed areas to achieve acceptable post-mine woody densities. Shrub <br />seeding and seedling plantings would be on a very limited basis. <br />Studies and observations at a number of mines in northwestern Colorado <br />have indicated that, under certain conditions, substantial volunteering of <br />woody plants, particularly sagebrush ahd snowberry, does occur. Since this <br />approach to shrub reestablishment is relatively new and not extensively <br />docwnented, field trial documentation would seem to be appropriate. If <br />re vegetation trials indicate that live topsoiling will not result in shrub <br />reestablishment sufficient to meet the density standard and wildlife forage <br />and cover needs, the plan would have to be modified. <br />5. Seeding rates should be expressed on a pure live seed per square foot <br />basis, in addition to lb./acre. <br />6. The application indicates that most topsoiled areas will be cover <br />cropped rather than mulched, and that, in same cases, a cover crop will be <br />seeded in the fall, concurrent with seeding of the perennial mix. This added <br />competition could potentially be detrimental to the seeded perennial species <br />and would not provide significant benefits. Areas topsoiled in the fall <br />should be seeded with only the permanent mix. A limited variance from the <br />mulching requirement would be considered by the Division. <br />Fish and Wildlife Plan - Rule 2,05.6 <br />Based on DOW information referenced in the application, the permit area <br />contains critical deer winter range, elk winter range and potential elk <br />calving areas. A golden eagle nest, which was used last year, is located <br />within approximately 200 yards of the mine area haul/access road in Hubberson <br />Gulch. A number of concerns with regard to the reclamation plan and wildlife <br />mitigation are discussed below. <br />1. The reclamation plan, as stated in the application, has been developed <br />with livestock grazing emphasized over wildlife habitat. Shrub <br />reestablishment is a reclamation consideration primarily due to the importance <br />of shrubs in providing winter forage and cover for deer and elk. Shrub <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.