My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13374
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13374
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:39 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:41:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984067
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
7/2/1985
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO ADEQUACY CONCERNS DISCUSSED DURING 6/7/85 MEETING COAL GULCH MINE PERMIT APPLICATION
From
ARNESS MCGRIFFIN COAL CO
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Michael 5. Savage Page Four <br />June 28, 1985 <br />In the future, after Peerless gains experience with underground <br />mining in this area, a technical revision may be submitted to the <br />Division requesting extraction of pillars in areas with less than <br />300 feet of cover. <br />6. The Division requests that Peerless monitor the Victory No. 3 <br />discharge by welding a stand pipe or other mechanism onto <br />existing pipe in order to assess the ouantity and ouality of the <br />ana potential discnaraes ov the ~oai euicn mine. <br />Response: Peerless will weld a stand pipe onto the existing pipe <br />in order to assess the quantity and quality of the Victory No. 3 <br />discharge. The quality parameters will be the same as those <br />monitored for other discharge points in the permit and adjacent <br />area. Flow from the stand pipe will be measured using a stopwatch <br />and a bucket. The monitoring information will allow accurate <br />evaluation of potential hydrologic impacts associated solely with <br />the proposed Peerless operations. <br />7. The applicant should estimate maximum flows to the sediment pon <br />The disturbed area drainage, Arness/McGriffin ortaT dischar <br />and Coal Gulch ports discharge worst case estimate should a <br />~e incTu ed. The se invent aon shou be resize to accommo a <br />Response: The maximum flows to the sediment pond are set forth <br />in Attachment 2. <br />8. As discussed with Mr. Strid and Mr. Czarnowsky, the existi <br />sediment pond at the site appears to be conducting water throw <br />the bottom or embankment of the pond as evidenced by a drop <br />pond water level, though inf ows are greater than discharge. T <br />Division requests a discussion of where the water is going a <br />how Peerless plans to contain this water. <br />Response: Based upon several field inspections which included a <br />visual check of the embankment structure, we do not feel that any <br />water is being conducted through the embankment of the pond. <br />However, some water may be infiltrating through the base of the <br />pond. Peerless will evaluate this possibility by visual <br />observations and periodic comparison of estimated inflow and <br />outflow rates. If water is infiltrating into the ground, then it <br />undoubtedly finds its way into the coarse unconsolidated material <br />within the Coal Gulch drainage. During the low flow period of <br />late summer, Peerless will visually check the sediment pond <br />bottom and, if indicated, utilize a non-toxic bentonite seal to <br />prevent future infiltration. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.