My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13373
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13373
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:39 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:41:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992080
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/18/1993
Doc Name
CARBON JUNCTION MINE ADEQUACY REVIEW C-92-080
From
DMG
To
PIONEER ENGINEERING
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a • <br />Mr. Darcy Ferguson -9- February 18, 1993 <br />Is well B-17 artesian? Has it ever flog <br />ground? Minimization of impacts to the <br />requires that all holes be sealed in an <br />temporary or permanent manner. Flowing <br />with a valve that measures head and can <br />water sampling. <br />ved out of the <br />hydrologic balance <br />appropriate <br />wells must be sealed <br />be accessed for <br />The documentation of the well permit and water rights <br />submittal on Pueblo Coal/Oak Ridge Energy is very confusing. <br />Information from the State Engineer's Office (Appendix 4-3c) <br />indicates Pueblo Coal has three well permits: 25629F; <br />26846F; and 31082F. Permit 31082F is the only well that has <br />experienced use according to these records. Appendix 3-4 <br />lists two well permits: 25629F and 26846F. There appears to <br />be a single water right, Case 82-CW-149, tied to Well Permit <br />26846F. <br />a. Have all three wells been drilled? <br />b. Please identify their locations on a map. <br />c. Have additional water rights been acquired? <br />d. Is PW-1 linked with one of these permits? <br />e. Please provide all drilling information available. <br />Hondina• <br />Attached are the Division's calculations on reclaiming the worst <br />case scenario. Several additional tasks not identified in the <br />permit were included. The Division ran several different <br />combinations of equipment selection and in each case selected the <br />lowest cost for each task consistent with keeping mobilization <br />costs down whenever possible. <br />The bonding costs are for an independent third party contractor <br />to do the work and includes overhead, profit, liability <br />insurance, engineering fees and job superintendent costs. Please <br />review all tasks to insure accuracy for push distance, haul <br />distance, material consistency, volume, etc. <br />Miscellaneous Comments: <br />1. Please provide a post-mining drainage plan. This may <br />include both temporary and permanent drainage structures to <br />handle water flow down the reclaim. Provide hydrologic <br />designs in accordance with Rule 4.05.3. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.