My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13363
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13363
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:38 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:41:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1983058
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
3/26/1982
Doc Name
MEMO 1ST DRAFT OF CHIS GROUND WATER FOR THE CANON CITY COAL FIELD
From
DAVID CRAIG
To
CAROL RUSSELL
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i' __ __ _ 4..._ _.. - ' <br />-4- <br />come in contact with natural ground water, degraded water quality may <br />result. Ttie reclaimed spoils left by the one surface mine (GEC} may also <br />produce a leachate water. Similar effects as those described above could <br />be expected from this leachate. In all likelihood,this impact has been <br />occurring 1:or many years as a result of the many unreclaimed mines in <br />the area. There is no available pre-mining water quality data to compare <br />with the e:<isting water quality. Therefore, it is impossible to quantify <br />the magnitude of the water quality impact that has occurred. Many <br />researchers have found that these water quality impacts can be greatly <br />minimized :if reclamation is successful. If adequate revegetation occurs, <br />resultant higher evapotranspiration rates reduce the amount of infiltration; <br />thereby reducing the amount of leachate produced. Almost none of the <br />previously mined areas have been revegetated. As a result, infiltration <br />rates are probably much higher than those on the adjacent undisturbed <br />areas. Under Permanent Program Rules and Regulations, all mines are now <br />required to adequately revegetate disturbed lands. This should significantly <br />minimize the magnitude of the potential water quality impact. Therefore, <br />no significant additional water quality impacts, as a result of the <br />current mining operations, are anticipated. <br />In summary, it is unlikely that the current and proposed mining activities <br />will.:significantly impact the natural hydrologic balance beyond background <br />levels produced by previous mining activities. Because of the lack of ' <br />pre-mining hydrologic data, it is impossible to quantify the magnitude <br />of the impact that has already occurred. However, if adequate hydrologic <br />monitoring is carried out, a better understanding of impacts due to the <br />current and proposed mining operations will result. During the Permanent <br />Program permitting process, all of the active mines should be required to <br />implement adequate hydrologic monitoring programs. This will better enable <br />the Division to make the required hydrologic regulatory decisions for future <br />mining proposals. <br />cc: D. Shelton <br />E. Bischoff <br />/ep <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.