My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13350
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13350
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:38 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:40:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/6/1984
Doc Name
GRASSY CREEK PERMIT REVIEW FN C-039-
From
MLRD
To
RAYE AND ASSOCIATES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-4- <br />XII <br />Total acreage disturbed or proposed for disturbance within each ~,e/~~ <br />vegetation type has been provided for Pit 4 and the Pit 4 haul road. <br />Si mllar information should be provided for each of the disturbed areas. <br />This information 1s needed since revegetation success standards will be <br />based on the relative acreage of a reclaimed site formerly occupied by N ~ n <br />particular vegetation types. A map should be provided which delineates~~` <br />the year and season that each particular area was seeded. ~-~ <br />Veaetatlon - Rules 2.04.10. 2.05.4(2)(e) and 4.15 <br />S~ z <br />XIII <br />XV. <br />The species diversity success standard proposed by the applicant is "at <br />least five perennial species ...". Based upon the baseline data, the <br />Division requests that the standard be changed to "at least four <br />perennial grasses and one perennial forb ...". <br />The wording of the livestock control plan should be modified to clarify <br />that the plan applies to the entire permit term, and not dust 1984. If, <br />in the future, the applicant wishes to allow grazing on the reclaimed I, <br />areas, a grazing plan technical revision would need to be submitted to <br />the Division for approval. <br />For future revegetation success determinations, the applicant should <br />specify whether one or both aspen reference areas will be utilized, and <br />that mountain brush reference area 13 and sagebrush reference area 17 <br />will be the sole reference areas for those respective vegetation types. <br />This is due to the fact that mountain brush reference area 19 has been ~ <br />disturbed by mining, and the estimated vegetative cover mean for suve~°v"5 <br />sagebrush reference area 26 is significantly lower than the estimated p,~.~~ <br />affected area mean. ~ {,p- <br />Fish and Wildlife - Rules 2.04.11. 2.05.6(2) and 4.18 sGi"~ <br />The statement in the application indicating that vegetation manipulation <br />as a wildlife mitigation technique is "not compatible with the goals of <br />the Mined Land Reclamation Division" is not true and should be deleted <br />from the application. Dozer "brushing" is a required mitigation measure <br />at a number of mines 1n northwestern Colorado. At Grassy Gap, 1t has <br />been determined that, given the limited amount of disturbance and high <br />elevation (mine area forage 1s not available to deer and elk in severe <br />winters), off-site vegetation manipulation will not be required. <br />The following specific information regarding mining at Pit 4 1s <br />necessary. <br />a) Coal seams to be extracted. <br />b) Maximum depth of extraction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.