APPCOR13320 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

G Summary Comments and National Register Consideration 6ri11 sites A, B, C, and D and their access roads will impact no cultural resources located on lands within the Jurisdiction of the U.S. Forest Service. There are no known cultural resources within Sections 22 and 27 which involve the public lands which will be impacted. There are, therefore, no known sites which may be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places within the project area. The land immediately east of Sections 22 and 27 is owned by the North Thompson Cattlemen's Association and does contain significant historical sites which are probably eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. These resources consist of a number of coal mines and associated industrial and domestic facilities such as log cabins. These sites ~~ar to this writer, to relate to a substantial coa4 mining operation from c. 1900 to 1920. A brief survey of secondary historic source materials failed to reveal the name or other information relative to this mining operation. These resources appear to be in relatively good shape and are worthy of a substantial recording and conservation effort. Although L'hese resources are probably eligible for the National Register, it is to be stressed that they are situated outside of the project limits and the boundaries of the White River National Forest. These resources will not be impacted by the proposed core drilling operation, and they are privately owned. Centuries Research, Inc. was retained only for study in Sections 22 and 27 and did not have permission to investigate the historic sites. No elements of this historic mining operation could be found to extend onto Forest Service land, and personnel in the Forest Service further indicated that these remains were exclusively located outside the National Forest [Mangan 1977]. A well established dirt road leads by these ruins to the Forest Service boundary at the head of Spring Gulch. The new access road to the drill sites starts at this point on the Forest boun- dary [Fig. 2]. Although these resources bear no legal or other associa- Lion to the proposed drilling project, they are worthy of considerable archaeological/historical attention, and it is hoped that some organiza- tion, such as Anschutz Coal Corporation, will sponsor such efforts. The North Thompson Cattlemen's Association should adopt a protective stance toward these historical resources.