Laserfiche WebLink
In regards to potential impacts to Federally listed fishes, it <br />is unclear whether the proposed project will involve additional <br />water depletion from the Colorado River system. Although the <br />proposed activity is not directly located in areas currently <br />occupied by any of the above fishes, the Fish and Wildlife <br />Service believes that any depletion of water from the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin (UCRB) may have negative impacts on these <br />endangered fishes. Simply put, water that leaves the UCRB <br />before reaching habitat areas for listed fishes may actually <br />cause cumulative deterioration of downstream, occupied habitat. <br />In this way, depletions are thought to contribute to the <br />fishes' decine. Consequently, OSM should determine whether a <br />net depletion to the UCRB will occur by Seneca II W project <br />development. In addition, whooping cranes have occasionally <br />been observed with the sandhill cranes discussed in the mine <br />plan. OSM should evaluate the impact that may occur to <br />whooping cranes as a result of the construction and operation <br />of the Seneca II mine access road. <br />In summary, should a net depletion of water from the UCRB be <br />confirmed, or impacts to whooping cranes be identified, a "may <br />affect" determination would be expected and OSM should request <br />formal Section 7 consultation from: Field Supervisor, <br />Endangered Species Office, 1700 South 1745 West, Salt Lake <br />City, Utah, 84104-5110. At this time OSM should provide <br />our Endangered Species Office with a copy of the biological <br />assessment and any other relevant information that assisted it <br />in reaching its conclusion. <br />Mivratory Birds: Due to increasing interest in determining <br />impacts to passerine birds, particularly species with specific <br />habitat requirements, we request that Peabody include annual or <br />semi-annual avian monitoring studies as part of their Wildlife <br />Monitoring program (Page 14-12). Such studies should utilize <br />currently accepted methodology and should be designed in <br />consultation with USFWS, CDOW, and BLM. <br />BiQ Game: Because coal will be transported by truck and <br />because an increase in traffic volume can be expected, big <br />game/vehicle collisions should also be monitored as part of the <br />wildlife monitoring program. If the number of big game road <br />kills increase substantially, Peabody must consult with CDOW, <br />U5FWS and BLM to develop appropriate means of reducing big game <br />losses. <br />Post-Mining Land Use/Reclamation: Although we believe that <br />much of Peabody's reclamation plan will benefit wildlife, <br />Peabody did not clearly justify the emphasis of livestock <br />grazing reclamation over reclamation of wildlife habitats. We <br />believe that post-mining wildlife use on the site is at least <br />as important as livestock production and therefore request that <br />reclamation efforts be designed to provide equal consideration <br />for wildlife values. In our opinion, to do otherwise <br />