My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13227
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13227
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:29 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:39:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1983058
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/19/1983
Doc Name
TWIN PINES NO 2 COMPLETENESS REVIEW AND INITIAL ADEQUACY REVIEW FN C-058-83
From
MLRD
To
TWIN PINES COAL CO INC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-4- <br />2.* The application does not contain a map of the springs and seeps <br />within the permit and adjacent areas. This information will be <br />provided by SOAP. <br />3.* Map TP-1 and the narrative on page 37 describe water uses in areas <br />adjacent to the permit area. This information must be expanded. The <br />SUAP program will provide a more complete study of the uses of water <br />within the permit and adjacent areas. <br />4.* A description of yround water within the permit area is provided on <br />page 34. This information was inadequate to address the concerns of <br />Rule 2.04.7(1). The SOAP program will provide more detailed analyses <br />of the yround water. <br />5.* The description of the protection of the hydrologic balance presented <br />on pages 94-y.6 addressed the probable f~ydrologic impacts of mining. <br />These conclusions will be varified by empirical information provided <br />by the SOAP program. <br />Rule 2.04.10 - Vegetation Information <br />1. The vegetation survey presented on pages 62-64 of the application is <br />inadequate to address the concerns of Rules 2.04.10 and 4.15. The <br />information was sufficient to describe the general species <br />composition and current condition of the vegetation of adjacent <br />,~ areas. However more detailed vegetation information must be supplied <br />fur the area currently undisturbed which will be disturbed by this <br />operation. The Division suggests that transacts be taken of this <br />area to define species diveristy, productivity, cover and woody plant <br />density. The Division will work with the applicant after this <br />information is obtained to set the standards for revegetation success. <br />Rule 2.05.3(c) -Roads <br />1. Inadequate design information was provided for the Division to <br />dote rnrine if the requirements of Rule 4.03.2 have been adequately <br />addressed for the access road. Specific issues which must be shown <br />in more detail than presented on pages 72 and 73 are: <br />a. the overall grade of the access road from the tipple to the far <br />north entry; <br />b. the angles of the cut slopes and embankments; <br />c. the design criteria for the Lewis Gulch culvert and for the <br />trench turnaround area; and <br />d. a stability evaluation of the worst-case situation along the <br />road . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.