Laserfiche WebLink
v ~~ <br />.excoed *_he 1evels~' particulates in the exhaust c~nissions shn:•m in <br />Table iII-1, Estimates of the air q+!;:lity impac*s re;ul'tina from <br />secondary deveiel*.*rent can be nrde 0'a t{is basis 0'~° arra Sorl1'c.a :~~lis';iCns <br />invn^tories and other predictive methods. <br />Solid Taste Di:,posal <br />The EAR sliouid present inforicetien about t;~e nature of the ti~asies <br />to be deposited in the mi„e vraste disposal ar•~a. Tlris 1nror~~i4tion sF,,;uld <br />include a description of th:e composition of the r:astes, particular~lc in _._~~•-~ <br />relation to leaching potential and to::icity under t1~2 hydr~yeolcglc re- <br />girres present at the site and long-tern stability aF tt;e :•:aste embank- <br />ment, ~:~ also recoirtaend that the disposal aroa be desirl;;;d to ccrnply <br />with state of the art vzllay fill design criteria, as as•,;: nisnosai oreas <br />designed according to tliasa crit>:ria and likely to provi;:2 a hlgh de•3ree <br />of lol~D term envlrarstzntal prat_rtion and safety. fur main concern about <br />ttie design r2cc:rm~nded in 'the carsultant's report 1;. i:ha2 th~r2 appears <br />to b2 no provision r'or undo-rdrii~ir,age and 1on~1-term {1,2. post-abandonment} <br />maintenance of the s~ructr!rzs d~si;ned to divert raters ar•cund the +vaste <br />dlsposal en;~~an~nent. Eurtiter,;.Ur°, the disposal area should uiti6iat?ly <br />be regraded to the «ppraximat;; or{ginal contour of the landscape with pro- <br />visions for adequate long tet`,:i {1.2. post minino) surface rultoff control <br />measures. <br />Finally, :~i,iother it is dEt-0tsited in a sanitatiy l;:ndrill or used as <br />a soil i?n:^ti~~i~ent, the sCll~ge STUdgL frGiJ l`i1C tr'Caa~i2ilt pli.nt mUSt mGut <br />State Health C~,^^.ar•t-mint st:;rd~rds. If thc~ siu:;r,e r:i"il be c1•~;rosii:ed in <br />s waste dlsposal site such as a County sanitary lt!nc1Pi11. 1•t.,ctn,nreland <br />~„1~t obtain th, pe;-m7ssron or zrie optirator of the c!ispo~al f_cility <br />befara the 51ud~~~ may be d-~; os lt~ri. <br />Land Use/Recl,~.nation <br />The ED,R does not address rur•r•en•t and rrojacted near-term levels of <br />Coal pi•aductlozr For tlic l:ortlr Fork Valley in relation to tt;~ degree of <br />corrpatib111ty of these levels of coil rlavelopc;ant arith oth~•r lard and <br />rescerrce uses. f?or does the E5R reflect a co;;iplete land use analysis <br />in view of •;;ha lack or' hydrolo•7ic arc:rlyses, an,~lys2s U+ :-~a«r tle=ds, <br />lznd use corrlic•ts from possible subsidcnr,•a and nt;~,r po:,sihla con- <br />flict: arch pre-Brining land us?:. I:~ also believe Iliac insuf;icient <br />attention is given to post~niaing uses of dis~turbcd l;,nds ~nr, th^_ im-~ <br />pnC'ts of LG4iSL•,T~pCiV9 qSe Of Yd32,^,r on lard a°s that dz;.~nd Ca tkc <br />av_i1a6111i:y cf ground and surSace eater. <br />Sfnca the envirror~ro2ntal impacts Hhich hsve already OCCUrr`.;d on <br />private larus care about in anticipation of receivinj a Fc:d~r:;1 base, <br />