Laserfiche WebLink
sample. Please include hardness in Table 1 and Table 2. Also, please identify the <br />tables in the title regarding their applicability to surface or ground water. <br />The plan proposes to monitor eight private wells in and around the mine permit area <br />assuming access is granted by the well owners. Please determine access and add the <br />specific wells to Exhibit AB under heading VI. <br />34a. Since the wells included in the Well Monitoring Plan of the application are domestic <br />or livestock wells, I recommend that the sampling parameters be changed from iron <br />and manganese only to the parameters listed in Tables 1 through 4 of the Basic <br />Standards for Ground Water Regulation No. 41. This should be done for at least <br />the initial baseline collection period. The tables can be found at the link <br />http://www.cdphe.state.co,us/regu/ations/wgccregs/100241 basicstandardsforgroundwat <br />erpdf <br />35. Structures and renewable resources are shown on Map1 and Map 7 and described on page <br />2.05.6-11. <br />• Ground water wells are considered structures. Numerous registered wells occur within the <br />permit area. Please include these on Map 7 and include them (or reference them if in <br />another part of the permit application) in the brief description of structures. (see also <br />related question #13) <br />• The affected area (the area to be subsided assuming a 25 degree angle of draw) is shown as <br />a red dashed line on Map 7. In numerous locations along the proposed permit boundary, <br />the affected area is shown outside of the permit area. The Division cannot approve <br />potential subsidence impacts outside of the proposed permit area. Please review mine <br />plans and modify as necessary. <br />• Map 1 appears to show existing buildings and/or residences. Please add residences to Map <br />7 (which shows the extent of the affected area) given the apparent close proximity of mining <br />to a residence(s). <br />Northfield Response: Map 1 and Map 7 were modified. <br />DRMS response: Response accepted. <br />36. For each structure the Division suggests reviewing the subsidence prediction, subsidence <br />control plan, and the subsidence monitoring proposed. In particular, it is important that <br />the permit text and materials clearly indicate far each structure the control measures that <br />will be taken, how monitoring will determine the necessity of any particular control <br />measure or repair, what form of monitoring will be conducted (visual, monument surveys, <br />other, etc.), when the monitoring will commence, when the monitoring will end, and how <br />frequent the monitoring will be conducted for each structure. Since the mine plan consists <br />of named panels and mains, ident~ing the commencement and cessation of monitoring <br />using the mine plan as proposed seems appropriate. A table format with supporting text is <br />