My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13191
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13191
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:27 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:39:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984062
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
3/1/1984
Doc Name
ADEQUACY REVIEW ENGERY MINE 3
From
MLRD
To
SANDY EMRICH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-3- <br /> <br />7. If Middle Creek Mine detention pond 1s to be evaluated as a permanent <br />pond, the following additions/clarifications need to be provided. <br />a. The total sediment yield for this pond, Table A, seems high. See <br />comment 4.c. above. <br />b. The capacity of this pond is greater than 2.0 acre-feet and <br />permanent water storage rights are required. <br />c. Based on Map 3, Permanent Sediment Control Plan, the spillway is <br />too close to its outlet into Middle Creek to have a slope of 0.03 <br />ft./ft. Map 4, Hydrology, locates this pond much farther from Middle <br />Creek. Please clarify. <br />B. Diversion Ditches - Rules 2.05.4, 4.05.3 and 4.05.4 <br />1. Ditch H3 splits into 2 ditches. Are both ditches constructed in <br />accordance with the design provided for ditch H3? If this is not the case, <br />the separate ditch designs need to be presented in the permit application. In <br />addition, Map 4, Hydrology, shows only one ditch. <br />2. What erosion protection is being utilized to protect the pond side <br />slopes at the point where the ditches enter the pond? <br />3. The design values for tributary area, CN, and runoff, as presented in <br />Table 5, Culvert Schedule, for culvert 1 do not agree with the same values <br />presented in Table 3, Diversion Ditch Schedule, for Ditch H2, which runs <br />through culvert No. 1. <br />4. The shape correction used in the design of culvert No. 2 does not agree <br />with the shape correction used for ditch P2, which runs through culvert 2. <br />5. Map 4, Hydrology, shows ditch P2 entering the Middle Creek detention <br />basin at its western edge. Map 3, Permanent Sediment Control, shows the same <br />ditch entering the pond close to its eastern end at the edge of the pond <br />embankment. Please clarify. <br />6. Map 4, Hydrology, does not show the location of ditch P1. <br />C. Haul Roads - Rules 2.05.3 and 4.03.1 <br />1. The haul road cross-sections show the fill slopes as lh:ly slopes. <br />According to Rule 4.03.1(3)(d), this slope is too steep unless tt can be <br />demonstrated that this slope is stable. <br />2. In accordance with Rule 4.03.1(4)(a)(iii), the drainage ditches for the <br />haul road and the associated sediment structures must be designed for a <br />70-year, 24-hour storm and the design presented in the permit application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.