My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13110
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13110
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:24 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:38:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/5/1981
Doc Name
Letter w/Modified Stip and a Findings Documnt
From
MLR
To
KERR COAL CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />reclamation increase is 1% of the annual yield, and salt Zoading would be at the <br />rate of 7.6 kg/yr, Williams Draw would be subject to a 2I% reduction by sediment <br />ponds, a 2% post-reclamation increase, and a salt Loading of 21.4 kg/yr. In Sudduth <br />Draw no additional sediment ponds would be built and the flow reduction would <br />remain 3%, following reclamation flow would be increased by 1%, and anticipated <br />salt loading would be 5.9 kg/yr. <br />In Bolton Draw, the most affected watershed, the calculated effects would <br />severely overestimate probable effects. Areas of existing disturbance have already <br />been reclaimed, or soon will be reclaimed. By the time anticipated future mining <br />in this watershed is conducted, reclamation of existing disturbances will be <br />complete, and probably the sediment control facilities will have been removed. <br />The most severe effects in Bolton Draw have probably already occurred. <br />FIVDING - The proposed operations have been designed to prevent material daaage <br />to the hydrologic balance outside the permit area. <br />All of the effects identified in the analysis are short-term alteration of the <br />hydrologic balance. (see summary of Probable Hydrologic Effects). The analysis <br />has identified no irreversible, adverse effects on the hydrology of surrounding <br />areas. <br />Probable Hydrologic Consecuences - <br />SUMMARY OF SURFACE WATER EFFECTS <br />1. Runoff and Erosion <br />During mining, disturbed areas would be susceptible to erosion and runoff. <br />Mitigated by sediment control system. Sediment control cannot be z•emoved <br />until revegetation is successful and erosion rates drop to natural levels. <br />While the sediment ponds are present, they will reduce runoff to the <br />receiving streams. (p. 780-126eeeee) <br />Receiving Stream <br />Bolton Draw <br />Bush Draw <br />Williams Draw <br />Sudduth Draw <br />Percent Detention <br />16.8 <br />5.4 <br />17.9 <br />2.9 <br />This effect would be temporary, and would cease when sediment ponds are <br />removed. <br />Following reclamation, the disturbed site would, for a short period of <br />time, be susceptible to erosion, and would temporarily have increased <br />runoff rates. These problems are rectified with time as the reseeded <br />areas develop with plant root growth and as the fresh topsoil becomes <br />settled and stabilized. <br />Contour furrows will be used to retain water from precipitation as <br />much as possible within seeded areas during reclamation (would also <br />reduce erosion). During the early years following reclamation all of <br />the runoff should be retained by the contour furrows. <br />At the end or the bonding period, vegetative cover will be established <br />and the topsoil stabilized, and contour furrows and sediment ponds wiZ1 <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.