My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13052
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:22 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:37:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Name
LORENCITO CANYON MINE PERMIT REVISION EXHIBIT 5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C1 <br />• <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />• <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: f30718h6-1567 <br />FAX: (3031832-8106 <br />June 5, 1997 <br />Greystone Development Consultants, inc. <br />5990 Greenwood Plaza Blvd., Ste. 250 <br />Englewood, CO 80111 <br />Attn: Jerry Koblitz <br />RE: Lorencito Canyon Mine (Permit No. C-96-084) <br />New Permit Application <br />Division of Wildlife Issues and Responses <br />Deaz Jerry: <br />I~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames 5. Lxhhead <br />Eteculive Direcror <br />Michael B. Long <br />Dmision Director <br />• Recently, the Division of Minerals and Geology (Division) completed review of the responses of <br />our initial adequacy review and forwarded them to you for the Lorencito Canyon Mine permit <br />application. Specifically excluded from this correspondence was a detailed Division concerning <br />those issues identified by the Division of Wildlife (DOW). The Division has completed review <br />of these issues and would like to summarize and focus any remaining concerns remaining with <br />regard to wildlife and related issues. From my discussions with Chris Kloster of the DOW, they <br />will not be in a position to formally respond to LCC's first responses until sometime later this <br />month. His verbal indications is that, excluding the shrub establishment issue, LCC's first <br />responses seemed reasonable, except for the lack of population sampling of the Flathead chub. <br />Due to the pending July 2, 1997 decision date, it is important that those other remaining issues <br />be identified for your consideration. <br />In our letter of May 27, 1997, our response to Rule 2.05.6(2) and Rule 4.18 was as follows: <br />Rule 2.05.6(21 Fish and Wildlife Plan <br />Under this section, all responses were found adequate except as listed below. <br />111. Correspondence was received from John Woodling of the Division of Wildlife and <br />Chris Kloster of the Division of Wildlife. Based on our discussion on May 28, <br />1997, the DMG will be reviewing this correspondence and will respond to LCC <br />by June 5, 1997 with regard to the various issues identified. <br />• Rule 4.18 Protection of Fish. Wildlife and Related Environmental Values <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.