Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />17) Page 2: The list of assumptions for the McWhorter pit <br />inflow analysis includes an assumption (1~7) that there is <br />no additional flow from the reclaimed spoils after the <br />first year. How does PWCC justify this assumption when <br />the development of spoil springs is clearly predicted? <br />18) Page 7: Is PWCC assuming that the regional gradient is <br />Zero, or is the example given solely for the purpose of <br />illustration? <br />19) The Division may request that the calculations for the <br />McWhorter pit inflow analysis be included in an Appendix. <br />Copies should be forwarded to the Division for review. <br />20) Page 10: PWCC should provide the Division with <br />calculations to show how the wet pit area was arrived at <br />for the Theis analysis. The Division may request that <br />these calculations be included in an Appendix. <br />21) The input values for the Theis analysis should be <br />provided in the text or a table. <br />22) Page 45: PWCC states that the impact of spoil discharge <br />to Armand Draw and Grassy Creek will occur until the <br />ponds are removed and reclaimed. How will the removal of <br />the ponds change eliminate the impact of the spoil <br />discharge on Armand Draw and Grassy Creek? <br />If you or the operator have any questions, give me a holler! <br />cc: Larry P. Routten <br />