My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13031
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13031
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:21 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:37:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
3/5/1985
Doc Name
SENECA II W MINE FN C-82-057 PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
MLRD
To
PEABODY COAL CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br /> <br />Seneca II-W Prelim. Adequacy - 11 - March 5, <br />1985 <br />Backfilling and Grading - Rule 4.14 <br />1. The applicant completed projections of overburden bulking, in order to <br />project post-mining topography within the mined area. The projections <br />included within the original application were completed prior to <br />submittal of the original application in 1982. Subsequently, in <br />connection with operations at the existing Seneca II mine, the <br />applicant has completed observations of reclaimed land. These <br />aerophotogrammetric observations have determined that the actual <br />bulking factor slightly exceeded the original projection (19.8q in the <br />operator's terminology, versus 15.3Y projection). <br />The Division reformatted the applicant's analytical projections in a <br />format more familiar to the Division. The applicant projects an <br />average averburden swell factor (loose swollen overburden volume <br />divided by bank overburden volume) of 1.32. Further, the applicant <br />projects a bulking factor (swollen backfilled volume divided by <br />excavated pit volime) of .91. This suggests an average post-mining <br />topographic deflation of 4.6 feet. Adjusted for the possible <br />discrepancy in observed versus original projected bulding discussed <br />above, the post-mining topography might rise by an additional 1.8 feet, <br />resulting in an average post-mining topographic deflation of 2.8 feet. <br />In either case, the projected post-mining topographic configuration <br />does constitute an acceptable approximate original contour <br />configuration. <br />On Page 12-60 of the amended application, the applicant states: <br />"Peabody coal company has tried to take into account all <br />of the factors that contribute to the development of the <br />final topography in the preparation of the post-mining <br />topography map, Exhibit 13-2. As mining progresses, <br />Peabody will continue to monitor the estimated appearance <br />of the topography with the aid of the computer. The <br />post-mining topography map should be considered a <br />'best-estimate'. If Peabody finds in its monitoring of <br />swell, grading, and field conditions that the post-mining <br />topography will deviate significantly from that shown on <br />the map, the Division will be notified." <br />The operator has been producing annual post-mining topographic maps of <br />areas graded within the Seneca II mine. This practice has proven <br />sufficient to allow verification of the post-mining topography. The <br />operator should specifically commit to such a monitoring program in <br />this permit application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.