Laserfiche WebLink
~ J t•". • <br />-3- <br />carefully examined and photographed, they were judged not to be <br />~ ~ <br />i of National Register significance. <br />Recommendations <br />The integrity of all sites and structures identified and recorded <br />during this survey has been seriously disrupted by human and animal <br />activities in the area. The presence of cattle was obvious throughout <br />the survey area, and their movements have nndoi~btedly destroyed much <br />of whatever cultural resources may have been nreeent in the area. <br />f The two historic structures, and one of the archeological sites <br />~ ~SGF 1203)_are believed to be destroyed beyond recovery of additional <br />I <br />data. No further investications are recommended for these sites. <br />Site 5GF 1201 will probably not be impacted by Storm King Mines' <br />activities because it is situated above the projected impact zone. <br />However, because several different artifact types were recorded from <br />this site, and because the surficial material may have eroded out <br />from newly exposed sediments, limited testing is recommended for this <br />site. By testing the potential for subsurface features at this site, <br />Storm King Mines will be assured that the chance of damaging significant <br />cultural resources through their activities will be minimized. <br />References <br />Nickens and Associates. 1980. Class II Cultural Resource Inventory <br />of the Glenwood Springs Resource Area, Grand Junction District, <br />Colorado, Prepared for BLM, Grand Junction, Colorado. <br />Bolen, C.A. 1983. A Cultural Resource Inventory of Portions of Storm <br />King Mines Properties, Garfield County, Colorado. Nickens and <br />Associates, Montrose, Colorado. <br />