My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR12850
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
2000
>
APPCOR12850
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:13 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:34:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981021
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
6/18/1982
Doc Name
JIM PENDLETON MEMO ON THE BOURG STRIP
From
MLR
To
FLATIRON COS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAFT <br />XVII. Backfillinq and Grading (2.05.3(3), 2.05.3(9), 2.05.4(2 <br />2.05.4(2)(c), 4.09, 4.Z3, 4.14) <br />- R PORTION - <br />Appendix J of the amended permit application was prepared for the operator <br />by Dames and Moore, Inc., and is entitled "Engineering and Hydrological <br />Data Supplement for East Dump". This report presents the results of a <br />hydrologic and geotechnical evaluation of the East dump proposed for permanent <br />construction at the Bourg Strip mine. The report includes a geotechnical <br />evaluation of the foundation site, including materials strength testing and <br />a stability analysis of the proposed pile configuration. This analysis, <br />prepared in keeping with the prudent state-of-the-art of slope stability <br />analysis determines that even if the pile's material were saturated, a <br />static slope safety factor of 1.5 could be achieved. <br />The proposed design for the East dump calls for subtle, less than S:I (horizontal <br />to vertical) slopes. "The general Land form of the East dump will be that of <br />a rounded mound some 200 yards northeast of where a natural rounded mound stood <br />before mining." (Page 11, Appendix J) However, insufficient data exists <br />within the permit documents with which to quantify the expected overburden <br />swell factors at the Bourg Strip. Without this information and an accurate <br />determination of the volumes of coal removed from the pit, an accurate volumetric <br />projection of the final post-mining topography cannot be completed. Lacking <br />a definitive overall bulking factor, the consultant recommends that a swell <br />factor of Z0~ be used until the actual value can be verified by field measure- <br />ment. <br />Two other mines have been permitted by the Division within several miles of the <br />Bourg mine site. Both of these mines produce coal from the same bedrock <br />formations which the Bourg Strip pit proposes to mine. Both of these approved <br />permits project inherent overburden swell factors in excess of 20%, resulting <br />in overall bulking factors in excess of 1.04. Therefore, both of these mine <br />plans project minor excess spoil amounts. <br />In order to project the relationship of excavated pit volume to backfilled <br />swollen overburden volume at the Bourg Strip, Division personnel revised Table <br />4 of the permit application assuming inherent overburden swell factors of <br />l0a and 200. In addition, Division personnel assumed an in-place coal density <br />of 2150 pounds per yard2, as reported in the Caterpillar Handbook. Utilizing <br />these assumptions, the Division projected a meterial balance for Stages I <br />through IV of the proposed mine plan. These calculations project that an <br />approximate balance of backfill versus excavated pit volume (overall bulking <br />factor of 1.00) would occur if the average inherent overburden swell factor <br />was 23.60. This suggests, based upon information developed and verified at <br />the nearby permitted mines, that it is unlikely that significant excess spoil <br />will result from the proposed mining operation at the Bourg Strip mine. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.