Laserfiche WebLink
~. <br />Northern <br />Coal <br />Company <br />The height of coal mining will not extend to the roof strata encompassing <br />the coal seam and no disruption of these beds will take place. Consequently, <br />the existing permeability and/or porosity of this strata will remain intact. <br />kNo changes, in groundwater communication within the srtrata or along~~~f+ra~dt"ure~ <br />4lineame'nts and mine inflow should be expected over what is presently occurrjinga <br />Additionally, monitoring of observation wells shows the "G" seam and other <br />coals in the area are aquicludes. Under these conditions, it is expected <br />that the joints and fractures and encompassing strata would be under a slightly <br />higher than equilibrium pore pressure resulting from very low transmissivity <br />of coals and encompassing strata. Ultimately reduction of these pressures <br />could result from mining and may improve and lessen the potential for movement <br />and subsidence. Subsidence is primarily dependent upon the amount of material <br />extracted from the coal seam and is greatest with pillar extraction or with <br />mining to extract a higher percentagz of coal than tJorthern has projected for <br />the area under Curtis Creek. The roof control plan for the Rienau No. 2 Mine <br />calls for pillars of 80 x 80 feet on 100 foot centers to be used when crossing <br />under Curtis Creek. Pillars will not be robbed nor pulled at the end of <br />mining. This will enable sufficiently large and competent material to support <br />the roof conditions in this area. <br />Northern Coal is complying and will continue to comply with 30 CFR Chapter 1, <br />Sub-Part 75.200, Roof Control, as administered by Mine Safety and Health <br />Administration, Department of Labor. These regulations are designed to prevent <br />roof falls and protect the safety of the miners. <br />Any roof fall that might occur in'spite of the compliance with these regi,lations <br />- would be a failure of the strata along the bedding planes within the pressure <br />:arch created 6y the opening of the mine entry. This ar-~ch.is showr.,in~,the <br />t• attached copies of chapters from tests on roof support and ground con•trol~ From <br />- these it will be plainly seen that any "what if" roof fall would not normally <br />have vertical cracks, but rather the fall would be dome shaped and would be <br />,, roughly the height of the entry above the original mine roof. MSHA requires <br />that any roof fall be fully re-supported before mining can continue. This <br />eliminated fractures from entending further in the roof. <br />*To summarize, there wirll be,no subsidence in that secondary miningh, e;:.gi.•, tfje,. <br />.mining of pillars, is not planned in the area where the Rienau Nd•!~ 2 Mihe w~ihlll <br />cross under State Highway 13/788 and Curtis Creek: The lack of subsidence <br />coupled with the nature of the overlying sediments •.~e.g, fractures discontinuous <br />and tendency to "heal" due to plastic response of sediments, would restrict <br />fractures to the immediate area above the haulageways. <br />F•• <br />The maximum extent of possible fracturing into the roof would be~himited.by!~the <br />'pressure stabilization arch which forms above the haulageways;. Noy arch wou~lld~ <br />abe present over the pillars since this will remain undisturbed gr,o,u~d~;~Max~4= <br />mum height of this arch is equal to the width of the ha wlageway. (i20 fe'et). ! <br />Northern's•roof control program should eliminate even these fractures from . <br />forming. <br />